Search for: "Doe v. Doe" Results 561 - 580 of 152,312
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2011, 3:58 am
An appointing authority does not have the authority to take unilateral action to dismiss an individual because of alleged pre-employment misconductUmlauf v Safir, 286 AD2d 267 Clearly, an employee may be subjected to disciplinary action for his or her off-duty misconduct that adversely affects his or her employer. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
” The post The American Legion v American Humanist Association: Bladensburg Cross Does Not Violate First Amendment appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:30 am by Deniro Pillay (ZA)
Where a claimant sues for damages for a personal injury claim, the proof of negligence does not automatically attract liability on the part of the third party for the claim. [read post]
3 May 2007, 1:48 pm
"The CAFC does manage to cite Depuy Spine v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 4:05 am
Employer does not have to pay benefits to former employees guilty of embezzling William Floyd Union Free School Dist. v Wright, 2009 NY Slip Op 03164, Decided on April 21, 2009, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe William Floyd Union Free School District asked Supreme Court to relieve it of its contractual obligation to provide postretirement health and dental insurance benefits to Daniel C. [read post]