Search for: "Doe v. Holder" Results 561 - 580 of 6,693
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2022, 5:36 am by Bernard Bell
  Permit holders were responsible for purchasing the devices. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:54 am
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The question we address is: does a grievance complaint filed with the assessor or board of assessment review at the administrative level by a net lessee who is contractually obligated to pay real estate taxes on the subject property satisfy RPTL 524 (3) such that the net lessee may properly commence an article 7 proceeding upon rejection of its grievance? [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The question we address is: does a grievance complaint filed with the assessor or board of assessment review at the administrative level by a net lessee who is contractually obligated to pay real estate taxes on the subject property satisfy RPTL 524 (3) such that the net lessee may properly commence an article 7 proceeding upon rejection of its grievance? [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 7:23 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
Additionally, the termination right does not apply to foreign grants. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 1:51 am by Florian Mueller
It made a lot of sense for Microsoft to provide that feature, but it ultimately had to settle with the patent holder. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 12:21 pm by Florian Mueller
In light of what a Federal Circuit panel--Chief Judge Kimberly Moore and Circuit Judges Timothy Dyk and Raymond Chen--said at a Tuesday hearing in Thales v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 3:25 am
In April 2022, INTA filed an amicus brief (pdf here) supporting Jack Daniel's petition for en banc rehearing of the BAD SPANIELS decision in VIP Products LLC v. [read post]