Search for: "Doe v. Sullivan"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,567
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2012, 1:21 pm
An example is the DeBeers diamond settlement, Sullivan v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 7:50 pm
“The fact that the plaintiff subsequently was unhappy with the settlement [he] obtained . . . does not rise to the level of legal malpractice” (Holschauer v Fisher, 5 AD3d 553, 554). [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 10:21 am
In the continuing saga of Aaron Charney v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 11:53 am
Most recently, Judge Emmet Sullivan of the U.S. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
Sullivan, J., concurs. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:27 pm
In re Sullivan (Fed. [read post]
11 May 2007, 5:30 pm
" Now, does that sound like Cooper v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 5:30 pm
" Now, does that sound like Cooper v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 11:27 am
In Jaason v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:07 am
Sullivan,Stephen A. [read post]
30 May 2007, 1:28 am
Sullivan, M. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 10:23 pm
Diesel v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 4:25 am
’ Sullivan v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 11:56 am
First, argued Frederick, the language of the Act itself does not explicitly preempt design defect claims. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:37 am
Sullivan (1991). [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
As a threshold matter, respondent argues that the appeal must be dismissed because the November 2020 order does not constitute a final judgment (see CPLR 5701 [b] [1]; Matter of Alexander M. v Cleary, 188 AD3d 1471, 1473 [2020]; see also CPLR 5701 [a] [1]). [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
As a threshold matter, respondent argues that the appeal must be dismissed because the November 2020 order does not constitute a final judgment (see CPLR 5701 [b] [1]; Matter of Alexander M. v Cleary, 188 AD3d 1471, 1473 [2020]; see also CPLR 5701 [a] [1]). [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:32 am
The Supreme Court. ruling in Maples v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:20 pm
The Carter v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 4:00 am
Denis v Sauvageau, 2022 ABCA 166 [31] Granting a stay of proceedings pending appeal does not send a message that an appeal has merit. [read post]
