Search for: "Doe v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc"
Results 561 - 580
of 594
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2011, 10:06 am
Kaufman On September 16, 2011, the Ninth Circuit handed down one of the first decisions to interpret and apply the game-changing decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 6:34 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., March 29, 2018, Reagan, M.). [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, 2010 WL 419393, at *2-4 (M.D. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 7:53 pm
Childers, 982 So.2d 36 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm
Does dividing discovery into class and merits phases make sense -- for judicial economy? [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 5:23 am
In Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
Board of Trustees and City of Hayward v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:00 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 355 F.3d 1327, 1333 (Fed. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 8:35 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., February 7, 2019, Teilborg, J.). [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm
Wal-Mart Stores E., LP, 298 S.W.3d 473 (Mo.banc 2009). [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 08-10761 (11th Cir. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:39 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 06-1672 (La. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
Unlike Wal-Mart Stores v Dukes, this was not a case that involved a policy calling for individual discretionary decisions. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 4:28 pm
This case is significant because it is the first known California appellate decision reviewing a trial verdict in an overtime misclassification case, where the trial court employed one of the purported “innovative procedural tools” (statistical sampling) to manage class action trials referenced by the California Supreme Court in Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., the court referred to the SEC staff’s no-action letter process on shareholder proposals as a “we-know-it-when-we-see-it” approach. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:33 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 2:52 pm
The report also makes an unusually direct pitch for the EEOC to be the litigation partner of choice in overcoming mandatory employment arbitration agreements and the challenges to the plaintiffs’ bar of bringing statistical disparate impact cases under Title VII in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision rendering class certification based on mere statistical evidence untenable in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Unlike Rule 23(b)(3), 23(b)(2) does not require that class members receive “opt-out” rights. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 9:02 am
The Norges Bank also announced the exclusion of Evergy Inc and Washington H. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
Fred's Stores of Arkansas, Inc., No. 08-2346 (8th Cir. [read post]
