Search for: "Does 1 - 35"
Results 561 - 580
of 9,755
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2023, 5:49 pm
DCAA’s Audit Rights DCAA’s audit rights are based on statute and contract.[35] DCAA’s statutory audit rights correspond roughly to the “examination of costs” and “certified cost or pricing data” paragraphs of FAR 52.215-2, Audit and Records – Negotiation. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:01 am
As a consequence, it was argued, the colour-inverted use altered the distinctive character (Art. 18(1)(a) EUTMR). [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
”[43] But section 14(a) does not specifically preempt state corporate law or even specifically mention shareholder proposals. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 8:56 am
Another 35 had academic attrition below 1%. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 8:56 am
Another 35 had academic attrition below 1%. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:50 pm
LEXIS 35 (writ den.) [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
Refusals to Deal Generally 1. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 7:43 am
Lulay, 739 NE 2d 521 – Ill: Supreme Court 2000 If a parent does not want a third-party to have custody or even be around their child, that decision is deemed appropriate. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
Joinder – Closes a loophole that allows otherwise time-barred petitioners to skirt the time bar by establishing a rebuttable presumption against joinder for a time barred petitioner and prohibiting such a petitioner from becoming the lead petitioner in an IPR or PGR. 35 U.S.C § 315(b-c) expressly provides for joinder, and that the one year bar does not apply in cases of joinder. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
Joinder – Closes a loophole that allows otherwise time-barred petitioners to skirt the time bar by establishing a rebuttable presumption against joinder for a time barred petitioner and prohibiting such a petitioner from becoming the lead petitioner in an IPR or PGR. 35 U.S.C § 315(b-c) expressly provides for joinder, and that the one year bar does not apply in cases of joinder. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 10:00 am
” According to Parus, that requirement does not apply to the patent owner. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:04 pm
Petitions Challenging Patent Claims Previously Subject to Final Adjudication in District Court or PTO Proceedings The ANRPM proposes discretionarily denying petitions under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:04 pm
Petitions Challenging Patent Claims Previously Subject to Final Adjudication in District Court or PTO Proceedings The ANRPM proposes discretionarily denying petitions under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
But does all this drama signify anything? [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 10:40 am
Tellis wrote recently, India “does not harbor any innate allegiance toward preserving the liberal international order and retains an enduring aversion toward participating in mutual defense. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:29 am
Quebec (Attorney General), paras. 33, 35, 36). [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
[Figure 1, Slip op. at 4] Unbeknownst to Goldsmith, the artist that Vanity Fair commissioned to create the illustration was Andy Warhol. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
Code § 35-42-2-1(c)(1), (e)(2). [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am
On the other hand, countries are fighting to get their cultural property back to promote their own states’ national identities.[1] The disputed ownership of artifacts in western museums is a well-known global issue. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 4:52 am
Attorney’s Office for the S.D.N.Y. charged the two creators of the Frosties NFT collection for committing a $1.1 million rug pull.[10] Nguyen and Llacuna were charged with (1) conspiracy to commit wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
