Search for: "Does 1 - 37"
Results 561 - 580
of 5,373
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2007, 4:46 am
On the contrary, the comparison must be made by examining each of the marks in question as a whole, which does not mean that the overall impression conveyed to the relevant public by a composite trade mark may not, in certain circumstances, be dominated by one or more of its components (see order in Matratzen Concord v OHIM, paragraph 32; Medion, paragraph 29).42 As the Advocate General pointed out ..., it is only if all the other components of the mark are negligible that the assessment of… [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 4:59 pm
You can find number 36 here and 37 here. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Copeland-Chatterson Co. (1906), 37 S.C.R. 651 at 653; Gillette v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 9:30 am
Does H.B. 2600 violate Article IV, Part 1, § 1(14) of the Constitution by superseding Proposition 115, which was defeated by a majority of the voters in 2012? [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 3:05 pm
1: United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
Does the EPC confer jurisdiction on the EPO to determine whether a party validly claims to be a successor in title as referred to in Article 87(1)(b) EPC? [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
The information is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice or any contractual obligations. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 2:25 pm
Leuthold does not refer to this authority and instead relies on paragraph 2.4(1)(c) of the Copyright Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 8:03 am
DOES DEFAULT TRIGGER THE RUNNING OF LIMITATIONS PERIOD? [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm
Claim 1 as granted read:Use of organic fibres having a melting point smaller than 300°C, an average length 1 greater than 1 mm and a diameter Ø not exceeding 200 ? [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 12:39 pm
Both sections 740 and 597 of the Code of Criminal Procedure were derived from sections 37 and 38 of title 6, chapter 8, part 3 of the Revised Statutes of this State, and were included in the Code of Criminal Procedure by section 1 of chapter 880 of the Laws of 1895, effective January 1, 1896. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 7:52 pm
” Id. at col. 14, lines 32-37 (emphasis added). [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 1:52 am
The People’s Courts Law does not stand on its own. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 2:13 pm
But I’m not sure 37:1-28 says that, and the court doesn’t mention 37:1-33. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am
Nonetheless, it does serve as a reminder that when a party recognizes an omission or mistake in an instrument affecting mineral rights, a party should not immediately opt for an easy fix via a notarial act of correction. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 5:00 pm
[1] Charles Dickens, A poor man’s tale of a patent, household words II (70) 1850: 1, in David Vaver ed., Intellectual Property Right, Critical Concepts in Law, vol. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 6:58 am
Josh Gerstein reports on the decision for Politico, as does the Associated Press (via the New York Times). [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
It was a busy media law week at the Royal Courts of Justice, with the seventh week of the Leveson Inquiry and the settlement of 37 phone hacking cases against News International. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:24 am
Id. at 1036-37. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 3:19 pm
Wallace (1988), 37 Ohio St.3d 216, 218, 524 N.E.2d 889. [read post]
