Search for: "Does 1-152" Results 561 - 580 of 868
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2016, 6:08 am
Flores–Montano, (541 U.S. 149, 152 (2004)).U.S. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:13 am
Code § 16(a)(1)(B) (authorizing immediate appeal of order denying motion to compel arbitration). [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
A declaration does not have the effect of making primary legislation invalid. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:27 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Section 32 should be amended to clarify that section 32(2) does not relieve an employer of the obligation to ensure meal breaks are provided as required by section 32(1), and applies when it is necessary to interrupt a meal break because of an emergency or other exceptional circumstance. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:27 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Section 32 should be amended to clarify that section 32(2) does not relieve an employer of the obligation to ensure meal breaks are provided as required by section 32(1), and applies when it is necessary to interrupt a meal break because of an emergency or other exceptional circumstance. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 6:00 am by Elin Hofverberg
Once elected they have an individual mandate to serve in Parliament. (3 ch. 1 § RF.) [read post]
[vi] Beginning in 2022, this value does not include non-probate assets such as retirement accounts with a valid beneficiary designation. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 6:33 am
State, 291 Ga.App. 455, 457 (2), 662 S.E.2d 155 (2008); see Jacobsen, 466 U.S. at 113 (1), 104 S.Ct. 1652. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 6:51 am by Bill Marler
The number of infected persons identified in each state was as follows: Alabama (1), Arkansas (1), California (4), Colorado (40), Idaho (2), Illinois (4), Indiana (3), Iowa (1), Kansas (11), Louisiana (2), Maryland (1), Missouri (7), Montana (2), Nebraska (6), Nevada (1), New Mexico (15), New York (2), North Dakota (2), Oklahoma (12), Oregon (1), Pennsylvania (1), South Dakota (1), Texas (18), Utah (1), Virginia… [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
 If the Southern District of New York adopts the Tele-Pac analysis, it could determine that “in book form” does not encompass eBooks. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
 If the Southern District of New York adopts the Tele-Pac analysis, it could determine that “in book form” does not encompass eBooks. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
 If the Southern District of New York adopts the Tele-Pac analysis, it could determine that “in book form” does not encompass eBooks. [read post]