Search for: "Does 1-25, Inclusive" Results 561 - 580 of 1,136
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
The legislature amended Civil Service Law § 167 (1) to codify the negotiated contribution rates for qualifying employees who retired after January 1, 1983, but the amendment did not change the State's contribution rates for qualifying employees who had retired before that date (see L 1983, ch 14, § 1). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
The legislature amended Civil Service Law § 167 (1) to codify the negotiated contribution rates for qualifying employees who retired after January 1, 1983, but the amendment did not change the State's contribution rates for qualifying employees who had retired before that date (see L 1983, ch 14, § 1). [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 11:47 am
Wei Yin, Southwest University of Political Science and Law (online) Panel 3 Legal Culture and History of Law in China and Europe (1) 1. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 10:40 am by Eric Goldman
As I’ve mentioned many times, lawsuits over buying competitors’ trademarks haven’t succeeded in court for about a half-decade; and even lawsuits over the inclusion of a competitor’s trademark in the ad copy rarely make much progress in court any more. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 6:35 am by Bill Marler
             Where does Hepatitis A Come From? [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:52 pm by Bill Marler
These vaccines provide long-term protection against HAV infection.[6 Hepatitis A is the only common vaccine-preventable foodborne disease in the United States.[7] This virus is one of five human hepatitis viruses that primarily infect the human liver and cause human illness.[8] Unlike hepatitis B and C, hepatitis A does not develop into chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis, which are both potentially fatal conditions.[9] Nonetheless, infection with the hepatitis A virus (HAV) can lead to acute… [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:52 pm by Bill Marler
These vaccines provide long-term protection against HAV infection.[6 Hepatitis A is the only common vaccine-preventable foodborne disease in the United States.[7] This virus is one of five human hepatitis viruses that primarily infect the human liver and cause human illness.[8] Unlike hepatitis B and C, hepatitis A does not develop into chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis, which are both potentially fatal conditions.[9] Nonetheless, infection with the hepatitis A virus (HAV) can lead to acute… [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 2:24 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
  The omission was clearly an intra vires error but, in my view, that does not mean it falls within the slip rule. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 8:39 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Domestic Relations Law § 117 certainly does not preserve the right to inherit a class gift in such circumstances. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am by Abbott & Kindermann
This case includes the following issues: (1) Does the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act [ICCTA] (49 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
 Article 50 is “neutral” as to the basis for a notification. 16:25: Lord Pannick QC refers to section 2 of the 1972 Act, which is headed “General Implementation of Treaties”. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 3:40 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Knipel determined the value of the two LLCs by adding to Peter’s expert’s valuation 25% of the differential between the two expert valuations, also applying a 5% discount. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:54 pm by CoL .net
The insulation however does not render the clause independent of the main contract for all purposes. [read post]
17 May 2023, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
Clearly, solar panels do not emit carbon dioxide, and implicit in this quantitative statement is the inclusion of “embodied carbon” in the calculations; however, the emissions included in “embodied carbon” are generated prior to the operational phase of the solar panels. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
" The appellate court said that as it stood, Cox wasn't entitled to rely on safe harbor because it did very little (if anything) even when told about repeat offenders, re-affirming the jury decision that sided with BMG and awarded $25 million against Cox when they found the broadband carrier liable for piracy by its subscribers, even if over turning that decision. [read post]