Search for: "Does 1-88" Results 561 - 580 of 2,112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
Specifically, the amended regulation states: "for retirees who retired on or after January 1, 1983, and employees retiring prior to January 1, 2012, New York State shall contribute 88 percent of the charge on account of individual coverage and 73 percent of the charge on account of dependent coverage" (4 NYCRR 73.3 [b] [1]). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
Specifically, the amended regulation states: "for retirees who retired on or after January 1, 1983, and employees retiring prior to January 1, 2012, New York State shall contribute 88 percent of the charge on account of individual coverage and 73 percent of the charge on account of dependent coverage" (4 NYCRR 73.3 [b] [1]). [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
This transfer of the opponent status complies with the requirements set forth by the EBA in its decision G 4/88. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
However, J 8/80 [4] stated that “for the purposes of R 88 a mistake may be said to exist in a document filed with the EPO if the document does not express the true intention of the person on whose behalf it was filed” (i.e. the applicant). [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 9:50 am by Ryan McClead
 Part 1 questions Goldman’s Sachs data showing that 44% of of legal tasks could be replaced by Generative AI. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 9:21 am by Bernie Burk
Again, no one should (or presumably does) attend law school expecting only short-term contract employment. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:30 am by Sander van Rijnswou
The then respondent therefore retained the sole power of administration and disposal over its corporate assets, which also included the opposition position (see also G 4/88, supra).Also with the opening of the insolvency proceedings on the assets of the company G. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 11:58 pm by Nico Cordes
Beispielsweise kann sich ein Anmelder, der eine bei der ursprünglichen Anmeldung nicht beabsichtigte Benennung hinzufügen möchte, nicht auf Regel 88 Satz 1 EPÜ 1973 berufen (J 8/80, ABl. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm by NL
 Chapter V does expressly apply to the Crown but [read post]
11 May 2010, 3:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
On 1 November 2001 an auction took place where most of the equipment was sold to over one hundred different parties […]. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This clearly follows from R 84(1) according to which the opposition proceedings may be continued only at the request of the opponent if the European patent has been surrendered in all the designated contracting states or has lapsed in all those states.This is why the Board concludes that “the same patent” [French version : ce brevet] within the meaning of A 105(1)(a) is a European patent within the meaning of A 2(1) EPC 1973, i.e. a patent granted under the… [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:53 am by Christine Wilton
  (case no. 2:09-bk-60452; adv. proc. no. 2:10-ap-88) (Bankruptcy Judge Ralph B. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 3:43 am by Broc Romanek
– FAQ #28: How does ISS evaluate an equity plan proposal seeking approval of one or more plan amendments? [read post]