Search for: "Does I & II"
Results 561 - 580
of 23,596
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
The Chief Justice does not look kindly at what Counselor to the Special Counsel, Michael R. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 3:28 pm
What does it mean? [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 2:05 pm
(i) seeking or accepting work in the United States with a different person where such work would begin after the conclusion of the employment that includes the term or condition; or (ii) operating a business in the United States after the conclusion of the employment that includes the term or condition. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
Wells’ meta-analysis does not pass muster under Rule 702 because its methodology was unclear, inconsistently applied, not replicable, and at times transparently reverse-engineered.[18] The court’s evaluation of Wells was unflinchingly critical. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 10:46 am
The rule defines a “non-compete clause” as: A term or condition of employment that prohibits a worker from, penalizes a worker for, or functions to prevent a worker from: (i) seeking or accepting work in the United States with a different person where such work would begin after the conclusion of the employment that includes the term or condition; or (ii) operating a business in the United States after the conclusion of the employment that includes the term or… [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 7:54 am
Nonobservance of such rules does not, per se, constitute a violation of law. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 3:37 am
With respect to a worker other than a senior executive, it is an unfair method of competition for a person:(i) To enter into or attempt to enter into a non-compete clause;(ii) To enforce or attempt to enforce a non-compete clause; or(iii) To represent that the worker is subject to a non-compete clause.(2) Senior executives. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:31 am
The MOC's announcement does not specify how such prior registrations will be treated. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Bankruptcy Code does not have a formal regulatory framework for pre-packs. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
The court held that (i) the summary of the merger agreement in the proxy statement is not sufficient to satisfy such requirement because the “Proxy Statement is not the notice” and (ii) the copy of the merger agreement attached as an annex to the Proxy Statement was insufficient, because, at a minimum, it omitted an essential document appended thereto, i.e., the surviving corporation’s certificate of incorporation. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
What does the final rule say? [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 12:45 pm
Risk and Insurance ConsiderationsThe final rule reinforces the value to businesses that may have a connection to PFAS to be proactive in terms of (i) evaluating their liability exposure, (ii) taking measures to mitigate or offset any potential liabilities identified, and (iii) implementing longer term strategies to phase out any PFAS used in manufacturing or processing operations. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:52 am
Sustainability-related terms can be used in names and marketing if: (i) the portfolio uses a label – provided that, where the ‘Sustainability Focus’, ‘Sustainability Improvers’ or ‘Sustainability Mixed Goals’ labels are used, the word ‘impact’ is not used in the name of the offering, or (ii) it does not use a label but complies with the naming and marketing rules, as set in CP24/8. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 7:00 am
II. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 5:53 am
Accordingly, the colour or additional elements of the prior design were not taken into consideration as the contested RCD is represented in a technical drawing that does not disclose any colour (Case R 726/2021-3 para 52). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 7:06 pm
The CSA does not require permits for non-narcotic schedule III substances. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:36 pm
But, while AI platforms might be the shiniest and most interesting objects in the current IP arena, acquirers still have to deal with much older (and mundane) tax questions like: (i) what is being acquired and (ii) how is its cost recovered? [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:56 am
” This requirement differs from that of the Federal CTA, which does not require any filings from exempt companies. ii. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
I. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:21 am
Until recently, I would have said no to both questions. [read post]
