Search for: "Does v. Barry" Results 561 - 580 of 868
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2009, 3:23 am
” The Supreme Court rebuffed one such effort in its 2005 Kelo v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:49 am by Rumpole
""Did that Judge in Jacksonville overrule Marbuy v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 6:31 am by Barry Barnett
Download.aspx (delaware.gov) Claim limitation that patent applicant added to avoid examiner’s rejection made a “material” change, barring use of earlier application to set patent’s priority date. 23-1147.OPINION.5-23-2024_2322401.pdf (uscourts.gov) Part owner of trademark owner lacked right to sue to cancel similar trademarks. 23-1383.OPINION.5-23-2024_2322382.pdf (uscourts.gov) Federal Trade Commission sues Live Nation for monopolization and unlawful exclusive… [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:42 am by Marie Louise
Crosstown Music Company 1, LLC v Rive Droite Music Limited, Mark Taylor and Paul Barry (jiplp) Doh! [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
However, the error does not affect the overall conclusion that the appellant did not meet his onus to show there are grounds to believe that the defence had no prospect of success. [read post]
12 May 2021, 8:08 pm by John Elwood
The 9th Circuit’s decision granted relief to death-row prisoners David Martinez and Barry Jones. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
Barry Soper in the New Zealand Herald has said that his defamation case against the Hagaman family of Christchurch does Andrew Little “no credit” and is proof of how “bloody minded” he is. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Johnson suggested that nuclear war might result if Barry Goldwater was elected president. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
: In re Kubin and KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc (Patent Docs)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: USPTO, Tafas & GSK request extension for reconsideration (IP Watchdog) CAFC: Patent on sex aid is obvious: Ritchie v Vast Resources (AKA Topco) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Assigning patent rights: Euclid Chemical v Vector Corrosion (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) District Court E D Michigan: LEDdynamics wins summary judgment in LED tube patent suit… [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 7:07 am by Joel R. Brandes
” Although the statute does not require a personal consultation with the child, it does obligate the court to find “some age-appropriate mean [read post]