Search for: "Does v. Barry"
Results 561 - 580
of 881
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2011, 6:23 pm
As Dave Barry would say, I am not making this up. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 11:22 am
Simply because the government obtained access to these files through use of a ruse does not render the consent involuntary. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:19 pm
From the New York Public Personnel Law written by Harvey Randall: Disciplinary hearings involving police officers are open to the public Disciplinary hearings involving police officers are open to the public Matter of Doe v City of Schenectady, 2011 NY Slip Op 03694, Appellate Division, Third Department The City of Schenectady appealed an order and judgment of the Supreme Court Judge Barry Kramer that among other things, ”permanently… [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the position of Barry George, who, along with JUSTICE, was granted permission to intervene). [read post]
22 May 2011, 2:36 pm
Connecticut and Roe v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 11:00 am
Does anyone really believe otherwise? [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:28 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:21 am
Disciplinary hearings involving police officers are open to the public Matter of Doe v City of Schenectady, 2011 NY Slip Op 03694, Appellate Division, Third Department The City of Schenectady appealed an order and judgment of the Supreme Court Judge Barry Kramer that among other things, ”permanently enjoined” Schenectady from permitting the public to attend disciplinary hearings involving City of Schenectady police officers. [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:43 pm
Van Camp v Van Camp (1921) 53 CA 17, 199 P 885; Pereira v Pereira (1909) 156 C 1, 103 P 488. 8. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 11:30 pm
For example, R. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 11:20 am
Yes,” said Barry Helfand, Kim’s attorney. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 2:41 am
International Hair Cosmetics Group Pty Ltd v International Hair Cosmetics Limited [2011] FCA 339 [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 4:30 pm
ASSOCIATION FOR MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm
.* What does the Defense need to do in Barry Bonds trial? [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:02 pm
Barrie v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
Makisi & Ors v Birmingham City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 355 Does the right to make oral submissions to a review officer on a s.202 Housing Act 1996 review, following a 'minded to' letter, mean that the applicant has the right to insist on a meeting? [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
Makisi & Ors v Birmingham City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 355 Does the right to make oral submissions to a review officer on a s.202 Housing Act 1996 review, following a 'minded to' letter, mean that the applicant has the right to insist on a meeting? [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:42 pm
Texas v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:36 pm
" New Mexico v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:46 am
" http://j.mp/gZlq1d slate's @jackshafer on "What journalists write when they encounter known unknowns" http://j.mp/fAq73f "McComish v Bennett: Does the Supreme Court care more about free speech for the wealthy than about political corruption? [read post]
