Search for: "Douglas v. Douglas"
Results 561 - 580
of 4,579
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2021, 8:00 am
Ritter v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 8:00 am
D’Amico v. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 3:25 pm
Alan Chen Justice Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar Judge Douglas H. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
Although no rule or statute prohibits side switching, state and federal courts have exercised what they have called an inherent power to supervise and control ethical breaches by lawyers and expert witnesses.[1] The Wang Test Although certainly not the first case on side-switching, the decision of a federal trial court, in Wang Laboratories, Inc. v Toshiba Corp., has become a key precedent on disqualification of expert witnesses.[2] The test spelled out in the Wang case has generally been… [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 8:00 am
Pineiro v. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 7:48 am
” Dep’t of Transp. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 8:31 am
NFIB files brief regarding Paycheck Protection Program borrower informationBy Douglas Clark, Fin. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 8:00 am
Carr v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
That was enough for Justices Black, Douglas, and Goldberg to argue in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 4:15 am
Seed Co. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 4:15 am
Seed Co. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 9:46 am
At least 100 customers in Illinois sick with the Norovirus. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 8:00 am
Seng v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 10:12 am
In Brownback v. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 7:07 am
In Matter of Austin ZZ v Aimee A, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 624156, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
The words “family violence”, “domestic violence”, “intimate partner violence” and “coercive control” do not appear anywhere in the Federation of Law Societies of Canada Model Code of Professional Conduct. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 5:34 am
Normal service looks to have been resumed following the Court of Appeal judgment in IPCom v Vodafone [2021] EWCA Civ 205, in which Arnold LJ reversed a first instance finding by Recorder Douglas Campbell QC that Vodafone was entitled to a defence of Crown use in respect of certain acts which infringed an IPCom patent, as well as providing some interesting commentary on the application of the de minimis infringement defence. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 2:00 am
Wendy Hartley v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 5:57 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 9:00 am
”Affirming the district court’s decision granting CUNY summary judgment on Plaintiff’s retaliation claim, the court explained that under McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
