Search for: "Dukes v. Dukes"
Results 561 - 580
of 3,525
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2007, 4:00 pm
Duke Energy in case you missed anything. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:01 pm
Dukes. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 9:11 pm
Today’s decision in Dukes v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:07 am
” Wal-Mart v Dukes. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:47 pm
As Erichson writes below, the Wal-Mart employment discrimination class action was decided today. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 9:43 am
Murphy, Gerard V. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 9:43 am
Murphy, Gerard V. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 7:22 pm
She became the face of the largest gender discrimination class action suit in United States history, Dukes v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 2:37 am
On March 24, 2009, an en banc panel of eleven judges heard oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 2:54 am
Wal-Mart v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 4:26 pm
On Tuesday, March 29, 2011, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Dukes v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:50 pm
Dukes has been coming in fast and furious from both sides. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 11:18 am
Dukes,” was published in the January 2013 edition of Banking & Financial Services Policy Report. [read post]
Don’t Forget to Sign Up for Our Webinar on Statistics in Class Actions, this Thursday at 1:00 PM EDT
3 Oct 2011, 3:42 pm
Dukes. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:10 am
Hoping to build on the animus toward class actions in recent decisions like Dukes and AT&T Wireless v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:24 am
Following up on the US Supreme Court's hearing of the case, WalMart v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 10:01 pm
” Duke v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 8:17 am
Duke University’s The Chronicle reports that the Honourable Mr. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:10 am
” In United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:50 pm
Rai Duke University School of Law; Duke Innovation & Entrepreneurship Initiative Abstract This is a brief of 72 IP professors opposing the claim in Oil States that the IPR procedure is unconstitutional.Petitioner argues that only a court – indeed, only a jury – has the power to decide that the United States Patent and Trademark Office erred in granting a patent. [read post]
