Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 561 - 580 of 7,356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2009, 5:50 am
In a previous post I erroneously stated that the appeal of Canwest Mediaworks Publications v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 1:41 pm by Ellena Erskine
ShareMore than 80 amicus briefs were filed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm by INFORRM
Unenforceability in the United States The Judge noted that, since 1964 when the Supreme Court of the United States decided New York Times v Sullivan 376 US 254 (1964), there has not been a single reported State or Federal decision in which a foreign defamation judgment has been recognised and enforced in the United States [89]. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am by Amy Howe
In USA Today, Richard Wolf previews Monday’s oral arguments in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 8:18 am by Nicholas Round (Bristows)
On 16 March 2023, the High Court of England and Wales handed down its judgment following the FRAND trial in InterDigital v Lenovo. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 1:15 am by INFORRM
The case will be of interest to anyone thinking about the complex relationship between defamation, privacy and data protection in English law. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 7:32 am by CMS
This case has already received attention in the media, with many stating that this could become the highest-value divorce case in English legal history. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 12:53 pm
There's a fight about the degree to which Section 14201 of the Elections Code requires the California Secretary of State to post facsimile ballot materials in languages other than English. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:25 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
[Jalla v Shell International Trading and Shipping Co Limited [2023] UK SC 16] [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 11:38 pm by Tom Cleaver, Blackstone Chambers
The issue in FA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 22 was, ultimately, a narrow one. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 5:14 pm by INFORRM
On 12 October 2010 the Fourth Section of the Court of Human Rights, presided over by English judge Sir Nicholas Bratza, gave judgment in the Article 10 case of Saaristo v Finland. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 2:29 am
 EUIPO claimed, that the earlier mark was ‘rather “lost” in the overall impression produced by the various elements of the pattern’.Fulia markThe Court disagreed with the contested decision, the EUIPO and the interveners, stating that the mark stands out on the canvas. [read post]