Search for: "Equities First Holdings LLCĀ " Results 561 - 580 of 1,051
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2017, 2:27 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Much rather, the implementation and impact will necessarily differ from state to state because lawsuits cannot necessarily just be put on hold unilaterally. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 4:31 am by Wolfgang Demino
The Court should set aside the judgment for the additional reason that the monetary penalties are grossly disproportionate, considering the nature of the wrongful conduct, and would likely be reversed on appeal, if not by the First or Fourteenth, by the Texas Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 1:43 am by Joseph Leahy
 However, also unlike a lender, an equity owner shares in any profit that occurs if revenues exceed expenses. [read post]
First, the end of August ushered in a hefty $5.7 million civil penalty against a major retailer in the United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 6:37 am by Colby Pastre
Today, the House Ways and Means Tax Policy Subcommittee will hold a hearing about the impact of the U.S. tax code on small businesses. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 12:59 pm by Renae Lloyd
    The post Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Censured and Fined appeared first on White Securities Law. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:07 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
Before that, he spent nearly seven years as counsel, first to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, and then to the House Education and the Workforce Committee, where he was responsible for labor and employment oversight and policy. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The debt was secured by a Texas Home Equity Security Instrument granting a first lien on Long's property. [read post]
15 May 2017, 3:32 am by Peter Mahler
” In the first of two decisions, Justice Singh denied the motion, holding that the transfer agreement “expressly stated that the transfer was for valuable consideration” and that the plaintiff “did not submit any evidence to contradict the statement. [read post]
15 May 2017, 3:32 am by Peter Mahler
” In the first of two decisions, Justice Singh denied the motion, holding that the transfer agreement “expressly stated that the transfer was for valuable consideration” and that the plaintiff “did not submit any evidence to contradict the statement. [read post]