Search for: "FRENCH v. STATE" Results 561 - 580 of 3,098
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The parties accepted this construction and Lord Carnwath observed at para 20 that the French and Spanish versions are equally authentic to the English text. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 4(2) expressly excludes from the reach of the political offense exception several categories of offenses, including the following: (i) a murder or willful crime against the person of a Head of State of one of the Contracting States, or a member of the Head of State’s family; (ii) an offense for which both Contracting States have the obligation pursuant to a multilateral international agreement to extradite the person sought or to submit the case to… [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:56 am by David Duncan
The SJC in Neary-French noted that the majority of state courts had rejected the argument under their state constitutions. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:56 am by David Duncan
The SJC in Neary-French noted that the majority of state courts had rejected the argument under their state constitutions. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am by Betty Lupinacci
United States, 333 US 46 (1948), the United States Supreme Court ruled that res ipsa loquitur applied in Jesionowski v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 3:09 am
The questions are as follows (translated from French):1. [read post]
25 May 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Brown, 2022 SCC 18 [2] At common law, automatism is “a state of impaired consciousness, rather than unconsciousness, in which an individual, though capable of action, has no voluntary control over that action” (R. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:09 am by tracey
Supreme Court Quila & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 45 (12 October 2011) AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46 (12 October 2011) Ambrose v Harris, Procurator Fiscal, Oban (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 43 (6 October 2011) Her Majesty’s Advocate v P (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 44 (6 October 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Jones v… [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 2:04 am
The post picks up where Eleonora Rosati left off in her post on the 2012 French legislation that allows  and regulates the digital exploitation of out-of-print 20th century booksBREAKING: Puns at the ready, Mr Justice Birss delivers epic CIALIS judgment At an eye watering 113 pages consisting of 491 paragraphs, Justice Birss's decision in Actavis v ICOS [2016] EWHC 1955 is recommended beach reading for those ready to jet off the south of France for… [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:02 am by INFORRM
The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human rights yesterday heard the conjoined applications in Von Hannover v Germany and Springer v Germany. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by Winston Maxwell
  This issue is currently being considered by the United States Supreme Court in the case United States v. [read post]