Search for: "Fictitious Defendant #1"
Results 561 - 580
of 608
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2015, 12:43 pm
Before March 1, 1989, if a copyright owner failed to affix a copyright notice to a work, the work was ejected into the public domain. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 12:43 pm
Before March 1, 1989, if a copyright owner failed to affix a copyright notice to a work, the work was ejected into the public domain. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 6:11 am
January 1, 1826) VAN NESS, District Judge. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am
These steps are referred to as (1) Placement, (2) Layering, and (3) Integration. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:30 am
Bvocik was charged with, and ultimately convicted of, violating Wisconsin Statutes § 948.075(1), which provides as follows: Whoever uses a computerized communication system to communicate with an individual who the actor believes or has reason to believe has not attained the age of 16 years with intent to have sexual contact or sexual intercourse with the individual in violation [Wisconsin Statutes] § 948.02(1) or (2) is guilty of a Class C felony. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 2:02 pm
As the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic began to be felt in the United States, the defendants used the COVID-19 pandemic as an opportunity to capitalize on a national emergency for their own financial gain by using the COVID-19 “emergency override” billing codes to submit fraudulent claims for Targretin Gel 1%, which has an average wholesale price of approximately $34,000 for each 60 gram tube. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 9:21 am
But the best way to understand the Sussmann indictment is as pressure on the defendant to help Durham develop this alternative history of the skullduggery of the 2016 campaign, either in his still in-progress report or—as I suspect—in prosecutions of some of the people involved for allegedly defrauding the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:35 am
The guideline has an “Application Note” that provides guidance on this: 1. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:51 am
The exception was bankruptcy: Forty-two firms with assets of $1 billion or more filed for Chapter 11 protection in 2009. [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:59 am
1. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:24 pm
The only plausible answer is: defendants! [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:00 am
Under the proposed amendments, instead of limiting BIDCOs to purchasing debt securities issued by investment companies and private funds that are rated “investment grade,” a BIDCO’s board (or its delegate) would be required to determine that the debt security is (1) subject to no greater than moderate credit risk and (2) sufficiently liquid that the security can be sold at or near its carrying value within a reasonably short period of time. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:28 am
The court held that a seller’s claim based on his reservation of title does not fall under Art. 1 II lit. b) EuGVVO. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 1:49 pm
It would yield bad both results on both sides, allowing statements to be admitted when they shouldn’t be and excluding them when they should be admitted.1. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 10:17 pm
It would yield bad both results on both sides, allowing statements to be admitted when they shouldn’t be and excluding them when they should be admitted.1. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 2:45 pm
Here are some brief and quite preliminary suggestions:1. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm
The 39 state court securities suits filed between January 1, 2019 and October 31, 2019 already represent the highest annual total number of state court securities filings ever; the year-end 2019 total undoubtedly is even higher. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm
The 39 state court securities suits filed between January 1, 2019 and October 31, 2019 already represent the highest annual total number of state court securities filings ever; the year-end 2019 total undoubtedly is even higher. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 11:54 am
And just yesterday, in his Times letter, the FBI Director confirmed additional details of the Timberline episode and defended the legality of the FBI’s actions. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:54 am
We can not also rule-out the possibility of fictitious arrangements or Agreements if the protection is provided to the Tenants and it is held that the Banks can not take physical possession of the ‘Secured Asset’ under Section 14. [read post]
