Search for: "Fisher v. United States" Results 561 - 580 of 1,017
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2013, 6:13 am by Howard Friedman
Kennedy, (5th Cir., April 2, 2013), the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the state of Texas had failed to adequately justify under RLUIPA its policy of prohibiting prisoners from wearing beards for religious reasons.In United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 5:37 am by Irina Tarsis
This year, the Supreme Court of the United States may (or may not) grant a writ to hear a case involving Nazi-era looted art for the first time in almost a decade. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am by Peter Mahler
Scholastic Inc. v Harris, 259 F3d 73, 85-86 [2d Cir 2001]; Johnson v Kennedy, 350 Mass 294, 298, 214 NE2d 276, 278 [1966]; Posner v Miller, 356 Mich 6, 9, 96 NW2d 110, 111-112 [1959]; Nicholes v Hunt, 273 Or 255, 261-262, 541 P2d 820, 823-824 [1975]; Willman v Beheler, 499 SW2d 770, 775 [Mo 1973]; Fisher v Fisher, 83 Cal App 2d 357, 360, 188 P2d 802, 804 [1948]). [read post]
The company has issued a recall on Rock ‘N Play infant Sleepers, which are manufactured in China and imported into the United States by Fisher-Price. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 10:01 am by constitutional lawblogger
Even as we await the United States Supreme Court's opinion on the constitutionality of a university's affirmative action plan in Fisher v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:47 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Perry, the case involving a challenge to California’s Proposition 8 banning gay marriage, or United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am by Allison Trzop
  Anticipating what a victory for same-sex advocates could mean in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 6:03 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Sidhu raises two concerns with the “critical mass” argument invoked to justify the affirmative action program under challenge in Fisher v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am by Cormac Early
 In his Verdict column for Justia, Vikram David Amar analyzes the issue of the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG)’s standing in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am by Bexis
 . to comply with state law while also being in compliance with federal law”); Strayhorn v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 11:26 am by Sheppard Mullin
The Flores court correctly noted that, “since Fisher, the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Concepcion has altered the legal landscape substantially. [read post]