Search for: "Foote v. United States"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,396
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2013, 2:23 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Maryland v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 1:26 am
DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Criminal Practice Gun Is Suppressed as Court Finds Search Unreasonable Under Fourth Amendment United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2006, 8:27 am
The treatise is the standard reference in antitrust and the common-law nature of antitrust in the United States makes the treatise particularly influential. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 1:33 pm
Since 9/11, both the Bush and Obama administrations have contended that the United States is engaged in a global armed conflict against loosely defined terrorist entities and undefined "associated forces". [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:50 am
Because Hutchinson was a public employee proceeding under the United States Constitution, Title VII did not define the court’s limits. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 4:14 pm
(Neighbors For Fair Planning v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 2:14 pm
Applying the multi-part inquiry test for admiralty tort jurisdiction stated by the Supreme Court in Sisson v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:23 am
The plaintiff was drawn horizontally in the bar, injuring his hands as they jammed their hands against the bar.The case came to the Court of Appeals via a certified question of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 7:40 pm
Roxborough is one of a few dual citizens who have completed federal court clerkships in both the United States and Australia. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:57 pm
Salmonella is one of the most common enteric (intestinal) infections in the United States. [read post]
22 May 2012, 1:00 pm
The Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) today issued a decision in Regis College v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 8:37 am
State Engineer v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 6:17 am
In Flanzman v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 2:32 pm
" (page 11) Of course, the states will appeal this to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:15 pm
From Rench v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 8:58 am
The development agreement was adequately disclosed to the public (and commented on by appellant) through public notices of the planning and design commission and city council meetings on the project; the “slight change” of expanded rezoning to accommodate 8 additional units and a greater diversity of housing types was an iterative change to be expected during the CEQA process that ESPLC failed to show precluded meaningful decisionmaking or public comment; and the variance… [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 7:17 pm
United cites Guz v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 2:32 pm
From here, search for Cox v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 11:32 am
PPL and the United States (which has filed a brief on the merits supporting PPL) rely heavily on United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 6:26 am
In United States v. [read post]
