Search for: "GMBH"
Results 561 - 580
of 2,545
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2020, 11:05 am
Shown below is a patented design owned by Siemens Healthcare GmbH, a company that’s part of Siemens, the most prolific patent-filer in Europe: This patent, U.S. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 3:12 am
Schiedmayer Celesta GmbH v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 3:44 am
”In re TrackFin GmbH, Application Serial No. 86175623 (June 17, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 9:51 pm
In Wasica Finance GmbH et al v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 1:01 pm
Personal JurisdictionSpecific JurisdictionBill of SaleOpinion Letter Sent from an Out-of-State Law FirmDue Process Clause of the Fourteenth AmendmentOklahoma LawThis case presents a question of personal jurisdiction. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Further, while enhanced costs can be awarded pursuant to the factors set out in r. 10.33(2) only intentional misconduct during the litigation can ground solicitor-client costs: Weatherford Canada Partnership v Artemis Kautschuk and Kunstoff-Technik GmbH, 2019 ABCA 92 at paragraphs 14-17. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 2:40 pm
The admittance of evidence into appeal proceedings is left to the discretionary powers of the Board of Appeal (Article 12(4) RPBA). [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 11:44 pm
En el caso planteado, una niña de 6 años reclama una indemnización de 8.500 euros por daños y perjuicios a la compañía aérea austriaca Niki Luftfahrt GmbH (en situación concursal) por las quemaduras que sufrió en muslo derecho y pecho, cuando, en un vuelo de Palma de Mallorca (España) a Viena (Austria), el vaso de café caliente que se le había servido a su padre y que estaba colocado sobre la bandeja… [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 10:31 pm
There is no better example of this interaction than the Shape v Supreme litigation ongoing before Dutch courts, with the most recent decision in this dispute rendered in December 2019 in Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (“SHAPE”) et al v Supreme Site Service GmbH et al (Supreme), COURT OF APPEAL OF ‘s-HERTOGENBOSCH, Case No. 200/216/570/01, Ruling of 10 December 2019 (the ‘CoA Decision’). [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 8:10 am
The Ortlieb cases arose out of a dispute between Ortlieb Sportartikel GmbH, a mid-sized German sport equipment manufacturer, and Amazon, concerning the search results for “ortlieb” on Amazon.de. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 8:15 pm
Welche Rolle spielt die schweizerische PicRights Europe GmbH? [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
DEAR FRIENDS: The bloggers here at the 1709 Blog have decided that this will be our very last post. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 1:39 pm
Author: Nigel CoxLicence CC BY-SA 2.0Source Wikipedia M1 Motorway Jane Lambert Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (HH Judge Hacon) Adolf Nissen Elektrobau GmbH &Co KG v Horizont Group GmbH [2019] EWHC 3522 (IPEC) (18 Dec 2019) This was a claim for revocation on grounds of obviousness of UK patent number GB2410366 Mobile for a warning device for road traffic. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 6:27 am
In the first case, the Consorzio for the protection of the PGI “Aceto Balsamico di Modena” contested the use of the terms BALSAMICO and DEUTSCHER BALSAMICO by Balema GmbH, for a vinegar-based condiment. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 3:22 am
Earlier this month, His Honor Judge Hacon (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) issued his ruling in Fromageries Bel SA v J Sainsbury Plc [2019] EWHC 3454 (Ch), confirming the 'Babybel cheese' 3D trade mark could not survive an application for a declaration of invalidity. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 8:37 am
Curetis GmbH, which is combining with OpGen Inc., received clearance to market its Unyvero LRT lower respiratory tract application cartridge for ... [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm
In the same way that Collins is undermined by the subequent decisions in Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2016] QB 1003, [2015] EWCA Civ 311 (27 March 2015) and Case C–362/14 Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (ECLI:EU:C:2015:650; CJEU, 6 October 2015), so Murphy is undermined by the subsequent decisions in Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599 (02 October 2019) and Case C-40/17 Fashion ID GmbH v… [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:11 pm
The airline, Niki Luftfahrt GmbH, contended that because the incident was not sudden nor unexpected, the spill cannot be considered an “accident,” and thus the airline cannot be held liable for damages. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 1:30 am
Like on Christmas morning, the CJEU finally delivered its judgment earlier this month.As discussed above, the case of Consorzio Tutela Aceto Balsamico di Modena v Balema GmbH concerned the registration "Aceto Balsamico di Modena" (PGI application here) in relation to a balsamic vinegar which is produced in the Modena region of Italy. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 1:30 am
Like on Christmas morning, the CJEU finally delivered its judgment earlier this month.As discussed above, the case of Consorzio Tutela Aceto Balsamico di Modena v Balema GmbH concerned the registration "Aceto Balsamico di Modena" (PGI application here) in relation to a balsamic vinegar which is produced in the Modena region of Italy. [read post]
