Search for: "GRANT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 561 - 580
of 3,839
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2022, 1:54 pm
United States, the justices are asked to decide whether a due diligence requirement exists for defendants advancing claims under Brady v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 2:16 pm
Presiding Justices of the First, Second, Third & Fourth Departments, 852 F.3d 178, 185-86 (2d Cir. 2017)). [read post]
26 May 2022, 6:01 am
While it remains unclear whether the blocking statute has any teeth, a December 2021 European Court of Justice (CJEU) ruling in Bank Melli Iran v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 5:01 am
A third annual report from the Department of Justice, as required by § 107 of FISA, was transmitted to Congress on April 29. [read post]
24 May 2022, 5:01 am
A third annual report from the Department of Justice, as required by § 107 of FISA, was transmitted to Congress on April 29. [read post]
23 May 2022, 9:01 pm
” United States v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:42 am
State Department. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm
For at least some of the Constitution, I agree with Justice Harlan's famous dissent in Poe v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:24 am
Patel has lived in the United States for nearly 30 years. [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:04 pm
A “Certificate of Service” is signed by Miller “under the laws of the United States of America, without of the United States (Federal and State Government). [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:01 pm
After all, a protest outside a judge’s home can be at least as intimidating as a protest outside a courthouse.Yet Cox seems difficult to reconcile with the later decision in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2022, 8:02 pm
The process starts with lawyers with the Criminal Conviction Review Group (CCRG), a separate unit of the Department of Justice, typically assess the review application through a preliminary assessment, to provide advice to the Minister about whether a remedy is warranted. [read post]
13 May 2022, 5:01 am
In WhatsApp Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 am
Given Vaz’s allegation that EOIR failed to perform mandatory duties specified by federal regulation, his suit arose under the laws of the United States. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:26 pm
In March, the United States Department of Justice brought a motion to sanction Google for misuse of the attorney-client privilege, and to compel it to produce documents withheld under such privilege. [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:21 am
Also important is Russia’s defiance of the provisional orders issued by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on March 16 in the case of Ukraine v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:26 am
Secretary of State Antony Blinken has told his Ukrainian counterpart that this progress — marked by Kyiv Embassy charge d’affaires Kristina Kvien’s visit yesterday to commemorate V-E Day — is a testament to Ukraine’s success and Moscow’s failure in the early phase of the war. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:39 pm
” ColombiaCarrillo and Barreto v. the National Protection Protection Unit (UNP)Decision Date: November 3, 2020 The Constitutional Court of Colombia decided to grant protection to the rights to life, integrity and security of Saúl David Carrillo and Francisco Barreto, human rights activists, following the decision of the National Protection Department to remove or reduce their security arrangements. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am
The Justice Department tilted strongly in favor of these executive officers. [read post]
3 May 2022, 4:30 am
In the balance of today's essay, I'll discuss a hypothesis first floated by Professor Stephen Vladeck and reported by the NY Times last month: perhaps the Biden administration is hoping that once the mandate expires of its own force (as it will tomorrow), the case will be moot; then, invoking the Munsingwear mootness doctrine (named for the 1950 SCOTUS case of United States v. [read post]
