Search for: "General Accident Insurance Co"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,730
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2010, 3:43 am
The case stems from a dispute over an insurance claim arising from a March 2005 automobile accident. [read post]
6 May 2019, 9:13 am
Zurich American Insurance Co. matter involved a dispute over coverage for sexual assault claims against Fetzer. [read post]
6 May 2010, 10:12 am
Co., 2010 WL 1208887 (Ill. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 3:51 pm
Specifically, this Bulletin relaxes requirements for insurers to conduct on-site reviews of managing general agents and third-party administers in 2020, and for 2020 only. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 7:59 am
The sole basis for this argument by the property owner was the fact that Carlos was an undocumented immigrant, that he did not pay taxes, and that he had used a co-worker’s name to obtain health insurance after the ladder accident. [read post]
9 May 2016, 5:42 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 8:38 am
Although health insurers generally are not required to make payments for any work related injuries, if workers’ compensation has issued a denial, the health insurer shall be required to pay for the treatment. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 8:38 am
Although health insurers generally are not required to make payments for any work related injuries, if workers’ compensation has issued a denial, the health insurer shall be required to pay for the treatment. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 9:47 am
Generally speaking, your auto policy includes 6 different, but important, types of coverage. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 4:59 pm
Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co., 2011 U.S. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 4:51 am
Co. of America, et al., 2007 NY Slip Op 08122 (App. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 6:04 am
Co. v. [read post]
31 May 2008, 6:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 1:51 pm
Unless your employer already has knowledge of the accident, you must generally give notice within 21 days to get retroactive workers’ compensation benefits. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 2:30 pm
Some might argue that with these decisions, common sense has ultimately prevailed.For full text of the two Supreme Court of Canada decisions see:Citadel General Assurance Co. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 5:47 am
Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 7:37 pm
Co. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 2:14 pm
Co., 5 Misc.3d at 725 [holding that "penalizing [insurer] for sending a follow-up request twenty-five days after its initial request is inconsistent with the goals of the No Fault Law"]).Moreover, Unitrin has proffered sufficient proof that the follow-up requests were properly mailed to claimants (see lnwood Hill Med., P.C. v General Assurance Co., 10 Misc.3d 18 [App Term, 1st Dept 20051). [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 2:19 pm
General Accident Assurance Co. of Canada et al (1977) 81 D.L.R. (3d) 139 para. 13 (Ontario Court of Appeal). [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 2:19 pm
General Accident Assurance Co. of Canada et al (1977) 81 D.L.R. (3d) 139 para. 13 (Ontario Court of Appeal). [read post]
