Search for: "German v. State" Results 561 - 580 of 3,581
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2015, 9:31 am by Hutko
Even more, the Court – similarly as the Austrian Supreme Court in UPC Telekabel and the English High Court in Cartier v Sky – recognized that the availability of this remedy is compulsory under Art. 8(3) InfoSoc Directive. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 4:00 am by INFORRM
The decision in Von Hannover v Germany (No. 2) is the second of two given on 7 February 2012 by the Grand Chamber concerning the balancing of privacy and freedom of expression. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 4:23 am
Not only is the Court just about to rule in in Case C-360/13 Public Relations Consultants Association v Newspaper Licensing Agency, but Advocate General (AG) Jääskinen has just released his Opinion [not yet available] in Case C-117/13 Technische Universität Darmstadt v Eugen Ulmer KG. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 12:30 am by INFORRM
As the online version was accessible from Germany and mentioned a German businessman, the German courts had jurisdiction. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 7:30 am by Andrew Hamm
For her column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse looks at the 1988 case Morrison v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
The Case of the Day is Agudas Chasidei Chabad of the United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
 As a matter of principle, Part I could be excluded if, on facts, the juridical seat is outside India or the law governing the arbitration agreement is a law other than Indian law , as was held in Union of India v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 1:45 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
This year marks the 10th anniversary of the Court of Justice’s (CJEU) landmark judgment in Pepsico v Grupo Promer Mon Graphic (C-281/10P). [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 8:38 am
  In a dispute between Apple and the DPMA (the German Patent and Trademark Office) relating to the registrability of Apple’s device trade mark depicting its flagship store design, the German Federal Patent Court had referred the below questions to the CJEU for a preliminary ruling. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The summary stated that the Supreme Court allows Eli Lilly's appeal and holds that Actavis' products directly infringe Eli Lilly's patent in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]