Search for: "Givens v. Clarke"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,332
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2011, 7:31 am
Emcare, Inc., 444 F.3d 403, 409-12 (5th Cir.2006) (finding § 541.304‘s language is ambiguous and resorting to DOL for interpretative guidance); Clark v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:56 am
See Prince v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 8:01 am
Clark, 434 F.3d 684, 687-88 (4th Cir. 2006)). [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Today’s live blog team comprises Emma Cross (Olswang), Matt Clark (CMS), Byron Phillips (Nabarro), Rachel Wilson (Olswang), Clementine Bottet (Nabarro) & Jessica Foley (CMS). 16:30: The court has adjourned for the day. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:25 pm
Clark v Manchester City Council [2015] UKUT 129 (LC) Mr Clark had a licence for an HMO for not more than 5 occupants. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 8:35 pm
" The case cite is Magaña v. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 10:12 pm
The paper, Iqbal and Bad Apples (which will be published in a symposium issue of the Lewis & Clark Law Review), expands upon a point I made in passing in an earlier FindLaw column: that, in addition to its difficulties as a civil procedure case, the Supreme Court's decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 9:00 pm
Clark, 137 S. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:34 am
LUSTIG v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 7:20 am
The recent decision in Natwest Markets plc v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 6:55 am
Section 203(4) envisages that if the earlier decision is confirmed against the applicant’s interest, the reasons for it must be given. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 12:25 am
The Court of Appeal, citing Cumming Bruce LJ in Clarke-Hunt v Newcombe (1982) 4 FLR 482, emphasised that to overturn a best interest finding, it must plainly be the wrong answer: I am sitting in the Court of Appeal deciding a quite different question: has it been shown that the judge to whom Parliament has confided the exercise of discretion, plainly got the wrong answer? [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:32 pm
The court ruled that Erie Insurance did not need to provide underinsured motorist coverage to the plaintiff given the application of the exclusion.The court in the Mione case analogized the facts before it to be more consistent with the facts in issue in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision in Eichelman v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 5:29 pm
The threshold question of whether a class representative is entitled to a fee in a California class action was recently answered in the affirmative in Clark v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:04 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 11:09 am
G.D. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:11 am
Such an approach is also supported by a decision of the House of Lords in Clark v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:37 pm
Bolger, 2 F.3d 1304 (3rd Cir. 1993); Clark v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 9:23 am
” Given the verdict, it appears the jury agreed. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 5:30 am
Barnhart v. [read post]
