Search for: "Givens v. Rose"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,045
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2015, 6:44 am
Finally, given how minimal the impact of any of these comments was, the Board was not compelled to find that, cumulatively, they precluded the holding of a fair election. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 3:03 pm
On a motion for summary judgment, this Court's role is limited to finding triable issues, not deciding factual questions that depend on the memory and credibility of witnesses (Rose v Da Ecib USA, 259 AD2d 258, 259). [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
In this case, given the fact that the Ohio Constitution is a document of independent force, the court should, as it has done in the past, balance the government’s interest against the privacy of the accused, and find that the officer’s violation of this statute rose to the level of a state constitutional violation, requiring suppression of the drug evidence. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:02 am
“Linda Brown was the only plaintiff in Brown v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:21 am
Duke Power Co. and Smith v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 7:39 am
Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm
The transition to institutionalized monogamy contributes to more egalitarian social relations, greater social progress, and a fairer distribution of the opportunity to enter into family relations.[13] Brown University Political Scientist Rose McDermott, one of the expert intervenors in the BC Reference Case, characterized the evidence that women, children, and lower-status males fare poorly under polygamy thus:… [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Certainly Roe v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 7:57 am
From 2005-2014 it rose to 880, a nine-fold fold increase over the 1970s. [read post]
19 May 2015, 2:57 pm
None of their allegations rose to the Rule 9(b) level. [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:00 am
Language Rights/Education: School EquivalencyAssociation des parents de l’école Rose-des-vents v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:03 pm
" The article discusses Williams v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 10:58 am
In State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 6:59 am
” Given that the final argument of the Term ended eight minutes ahead of schedule, it looks like the Court may well agree. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 7:11 pm
Gallo Winery v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 1:39 pm
See generally Rose v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:10 am
Rose, Thomas P. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:10 am
Rose, Thomas P. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:35 am
Howard Piltch et al. v. [read post]
