Search for: "Goldstein v Held"
Results 561 - 580
of 886
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm
Pinholster, which held that habeas review is limited to the record that was before the state court; and (3) whether the decision of the Second Circuit affords the state court the deference required by 28 U.S.C § 2254(d), as interpreted by this Court in Harrington v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 5:20 am
” Last week’s oral argument in Daimler AG v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:31 am
Pinholster, which held that habeas review is limited to the record that was before the state court; and (3) whether the decision of the Second Circuit affords the state court the deference required by 28 U.S.C § 2254(d), as interpreted by this Court in Harrington v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 5:41 pm
Next week, in Schuette v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 12:24 pm
Troice; Proskauer Rose LLP v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 4:35 am
John Elwood reviews the cases that the Court relisted or held after Monday’s order list. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 9:07 pm
In fact, this new case was held on the Court’s docket until the ruling in Kiobel v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:05 am
Troice and Proskauer Rose LLP v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C. represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:01 am
Rajala v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 4:06 am
Observing that the Court’s 1983 decision in Marsh v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 4:20 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 12:23 pm
Mark Goldstein contributed to the content of this post. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 3:55 am
Rosen Trust v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 11:50 am
The Second Circuit has held that undocumented workers cannot recover back pay, but it left unresolved the critical question of whether they can seek reinstatement.In Palma, et al. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm
She joined Akin Gump and worked to expand the firm’s appellate litigation practice, alongside this blog’s Tom Goldstein. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:06 am
Not so in Oracle v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 7:27 am
” In 2002, the Court held in Atkins v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
Perry; Kevin Russell of the law firm Goldstein & Russell, P.C. was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Perry, in which the Court held that the sponsors of California’s ban on same-sex marriage lacked standing to defend the initiative on appeal, and United States v. [read post]
