Search for: "Goode v. Delaware"
Results 561 - 580
of 2,249
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2009, 2:22 am
ScotusBlog analyzes the Supreme Court's opinion in 14 Penn Plaza, LLC v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 12:48 pm
County of Delaware, 586 F.3d 219, 221 (2d Cir.2009).... [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:13 am
Group, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:18 pm
In a relatively recent Delaware Court of Chancery case, involving craigslist and its minority shareholder eBay, (cited ad nauseam in social enterprise circles: eBay Domestic Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 9:00 am
We are discussing San Antonio Fire & Policy v. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 6:36 pm
Any commercial or corporate litigator who needs to pursue claims against a dissolved entity should read the recent Delaware Court of Chancery opinion in Capone v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 1:54 pm
The Huff Energy Fund, L.P. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:23 pm
Why This Case is Important: The Court of Chancery opinion in Obeid v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 7:47 pm
TW Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 3:50 am
But the Tooley test—the standard, under both Delaware and New York law to determine whether a claim is direct or derivative—is a good one. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:56 pm
Applying the standard articulated in the Delaware Supreme Court decision of Doe v. [read post]
26 Mar 2022, 6:01 am
Mangino, and Matthew V. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
See Frantz v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
See Frantz v. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 8:28 am
Arbino v. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 3:30 pm
My good friend and leading Delaware corporate law litigator Francis Pileggi has a new blog post that digs into an earlier decision in the case. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 11:20 am
See Encite LLC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 12:32 pm
Dubuque v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 3:30 am
” In Marx v Akers, 88 NY2d 189 [1996], the Court of Appeals held: a complaint challenging the excessiveness of director compensation must—to survive a dismissal motion—allege compensation rates excessive on their face or other facts which call into question whether the compensation was fair to the corporation when approved, the good faith of the directors setting those rates, or that the decision to set the compensation could not have been a product of valid… [read post]
