Search for: "Government's Response to Motion in Opposition" Results 561 - 580 of 1,382
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2017, 8:16 am by David Luban
As a result, the abortion took place without DOJ filing an emergency motion for a stay. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 6:18 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Even though a response is not legally required for motions, it would still be a good to file an opposition when appropriate, but the test in the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure is whether a response is required. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:39 pm by Marty Lederman
  Whatever one thinks about the merits of DOJ's arguments in the more recent "Travel Ban 3" litigation, its arguments there are much more serious, and professionally responsible, because DOJ and other lawyers were able to shape the government's conduct before it happened. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky and Theodore R. Flo
  Plaintiff’s reply in support of its motion for a preliminary injunction and opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss January 5, 2018. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:52 am by Joy Waltemath
Despite the procedural improprieties of allowing intervenors to join a defunct lawsuit, the district court granted their motion for expediency’s sake. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
The Social Media Law Bulletin has a post entitled “Who is responsible for fan sites? [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 2:48 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
  Hamas claimed responsibility for the Iranian sponsored attack in 1997, and a federal district court in Washington, DC in 2003 awarded the plaintiffs $71.5 million in a default judgment, holding Iran culpable. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 7:57 am by Adam B. Edgecombe, Esq.
  When courts receive guidance as to why such motions are improper, they are usually responsive and will not grant them. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
A majority of the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld the motion judge’s decision. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 5:44 pm by David Kopel
The attempted confiscation was part of a royal plan to disarm America, set in motion by King George III’s October 1774 embargo on the shipment of firearms and gunpowder to America. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 10:45 am by Guest Author
  The odd man out in this split of authority is the Ninth Circuit, which is the circuit whose decisions govern employers in California. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:47 pm by Wolfgang Demino
’S MOTION TO INTERVENE  AND OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO APPROVE CONSENT JUDGMENT Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24, Intervenor Transworld Systems Inc. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:47 pm by Wolfgang Demino
’S MOTION TO INTERVENE  AND OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO APPROVE CONSENT JUDGMENT Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24, Intervenor Transworld Systems Inc. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:39 pm by Wolfgang Demino
See excerpt from its filing below: The Bureau also did not oppose the motions to intervene filed by Ambac, the insurer for some of noteholders as well as an investor.Below is the text of the Bureau’s motion response in opposition (admittedly not very reader-friendly since the cut-and-paste from pdf does not work well with footnotes and formatting). [read post]