Search for: "Grant v Metropolitan" Results 561 - 580 of 801
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2011, 5:02 pm by INFORRM
  Episode 2 concerns claims by Uri Geller and former Metropolitan Police Commander Ali Dizaei Next Week in the Courts We are not aware of any media law cases before the courts in the next week. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court has granted permission to appeal. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 11:13 am by Mike
 Magistrate Bernard Zimmerman explains: While plaintiff agrees that the abuse of discretion standard applies, she urges the Court to conduct a heightened review under Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm by INFORRM
  Permission to appeal on quantum was granted. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
The Reynolds defence, for example, has been discussed in courts across the Commonwealth, e.g. in Canada (Grant v Torstar [2009] SCC 61). [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:51 am by sally
Milebush Properties Ltd v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council and another [2011] EWCA Civ 270; [2011] WLR (D) 96 “Although the court had a wide discretion to grant declaratory relief in diverse circumstances in both public and private law proceedings, where a party who was not a party to the contract brought private proceedings seeking declaratory relief to enforce a public authority’s planning obligation the court would not lend its assistance. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:30 am by INFORRM
On  Wednesday 16 March 2011, the “Independent” reported that the Metropolitan Police was afraid of the impact of disclosure in civil cases on its criminal investigation. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by Guest Blogger
All of these efforts took Nixon’s Compromise for granted. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 12:51 pm
The Supreme Court expressed such "serious concerns" in Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:13 am by Daithí
(Apparently Godfrey v Demon is the leading case. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 3:26 am
Removal from the payrollKahn v SUNY Health Science Center, 271 AD2d 656The employer tells the employee that he or she is off the payroll. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:32 am by INFORRM
  Judgment was entered in default and the damages were then assessed by the court and a permanent injunction granted. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
In Metropolitan International Schools v Designtechnica [2009] EWHC 1765 (QB) at [35] Eady J commented that it was “surprising how little authority there is within this jurisdiction applying the common law of publication or its modern statutory refinements to internet communications”, and the same is the case in Australia[5]. [read post]