Search for: "Grant v. Board of Retirement"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,036
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Davidson 136,000 287,250 0 142,350 565,600 V. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 8:23 am
Health Care and Retirement Corp., 810 So.2d 958, 964 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 6:24 am
Summary judgment against her Title VII sex discrimination claim was affirmed (Cox v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:19 am
Adam Liptak at the NYT covers the Court’s decision to grant cert. in the Magwood v. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 3:56 am
In one of two decisions on this year’s list by Commercial Division Justice Saliann Scarpulla, the court interpreted the deadlock dissolution statute to deny standing to a 49% shareholder despite a shareholders’ agreement that granted him and the 51% shareholder co-equal board control. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
Gonzales Board of Immigration AppealsPER CURIAM. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 11:12 am
After her former insurance agent retired, a new agent allowed the insurance to lapse in 2005. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am
Stephens, 13-7211 (granted at the March 21 Conference, relisted once); Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 1:36 pm
Ability to cultivate and maintain relationships with advocacy partners such as senior-level former government officials, retired military leaders, diplomats, or intelligence officials. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm
Ability to cultivate and maintain relationships with advocacy partners such as senior-level former government officials, retired military leaders, diplomats, or intelligence officials. [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 5:59 pm
Mukasey Board of Immigration Appeals 08a0563n.06 USA v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that, in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board may construe claims in an issued patent according to their broadest reasonable interpretation rather than their plain and ordinary meaning; and (2) whether the court of appeals erred in holding that, even if the Board exceeds its statutory authority in instituting an IPR proceeding, the Board’s decision whether to institute an IPR proceeding… [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:43 am
Supreme Court granted the AFC’s motion, and directed a new hearing. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., 678 F.3d 30 (3d Cir.), cert. granted, 133 S.Ct. 694 (U.S. 2012). [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 12:03 am
Without limiting the foregoing, the subjects of health insurance and retirement are by this section excluded from arbitration. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am
Jay J granted summary judgment to the claimants, Russell Brand and Jemima Goldsmith. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 4:15 pm
In its view, Hardt could not establish that she was a “prevailing party” under the Supreme Court’s decision in Buckhannon Board and Care Home v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 11:13 pm
(Docket Report) Rembrandt Vision Technologies – Judge Ward’s announced retirement “shifts the private and public interest factors more in the direction of transferring venue”: Rembrandt Vision Technologies LP v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 9:15 am
Murphy guests a piece in PatLit on a couple of US Patent Trial and Appeal Board decisions on estoppel in America Invents Act (AIA) post-grant patent challenges [Merpel explains: the AIA is a sexy subject, but even sexy subjects have their non-sexy bits: that's where estoppel comes in].Around the weblogs 2. [read post]
