Search for: "Grant v. Scott"
Results 561 - 580
of 2,433
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2021, 3:05 pm
The first, which seems like a likely grant, is United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:31 am
Its reasoning for so holding is entirely consistent with the approach to section 60(2) laid down by the Court of Appeal in this country in Grimme v Scott and KCI v Smith & Nephew (see my previous judgment at [102]).Fourthly, the Court took into account (at [4.34]-[4.36]) the fact that Sun had not taken steps which it could have taken, but this does not appear to have been critical to its reasoning. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
Co. v Cherian, 202 AD2d 434, 435). [read post]
31 May 2014, 4:57 am
Scott Walker, Governor of Wisconsin, et al., No. 13-3193 (U.S. 7th Cir., April 18, 2014). [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 3:32 pm
" Accordingly, the defendant's motion to suppress the results of any chemical analysis of defendant's breath, any and all statements attributed to her and all other evidence allegedly obtained from her is granted. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 8:26 am
”) Scott v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am
At Ipsa Loquitur, Scott Hechinger “contextualize[s] these two grants of certiorari within the Court’s shifting Eighth Amendment jurisprudence and the broader debate over the harshest forms of juvenile sentencing. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 6:17 am
In Atlantic v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 1:51 pm
In Office Depot, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 5:59 am
Scott, 2009 U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:21 pm
Howard Venture LLC v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 3:22 pm
Finally, where the factual allegations contained in an information "give an accused sufficient notice to prepare a defense and are adequately detailed to prevent a defendant from being tried twice for the same offense, they should be given a fair and not overly restrictive or technical reading" (People v Casey, 95 NY2d 354, 360 [2000]; see also People v Konieczny, 2 NY3d 569 [2004]; People v Jacoby, 304 NY 33, 38-40 [1952]; People v Knapp, 152 Misc 368,… [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 10:56 am
An ironic aspect of this conflict is that DNA2.0 is a past recipient of grant money from NIH. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 10:56 am
An ironic aspect of this conflict is that DNA2.0 is a past recipient of grant money from NIH. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 11:21 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 9:43 am
Mullins v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:21 pm
We conclude that the stay factors have been met in this case, and we therefore grant the motion for stay pending hearing by the merits panel. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 5:28 pm
Yesterday's Daily Journal had an article (subscription) on the Court of Appeal's decision last Friday to publish its opinion in Kullar v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 2:17 pm
Yesterday in Cullen v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 8:44 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Medical Malpractice Opinions Body: DiLieto v. [read post]
