Search for: "Graves v. Powers" Results 561 - 580 of 1,159
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2018, 12:52 pm by William Ford
ICYMI: This Weekend on Lawfare Vanessa Sauter shared the Lawfare Podcast, in which Steve Vladeck and Scott Anderson discuss the complexities of United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 12:45 pm
It’s designed as a testament to the ultimate power of the state to kill and control its citizens. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 1:33 pm by Alfred Brophy
The Reparations movements, both historical and modern, reflect a growing consciousness that today’s most powerful nations and institutions were constructed through the commission of grave and inhumane crimes. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 12:29 pm by Garrett Hinck
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck provided a primer on the merits issues in ACLU v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 5:26 am by Steve Lubet
  According to the AAUP Statement on Extramural Utterances, a faculty member may be disciplined if "the professor’s extramural utterances raise grave doubts concerning the professor’s fitness" for service in his or her position. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am by Peter Margulies
That position, the Ninth Circuit warned, would leave governance gravely out of kilter, allowing the executive branch to “run[] roughshod over the principle of separation of powers. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:17 am by Emily Martin
Such a reversal would have grave real-world impacts. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:38 am by RUTH SMITH, MILLS & REEVE
Based on EU jurisprudence the decisive test is whether the authority “manifestly and gravely disregarded the limits on its discretion”. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 12:00 pm
In 2014, Old Dominion entered into an Engineer, Procure and Construct Contract (“White Oak Agreement”) with Plaintiff, White Oak Power Constructors (“White Oak”) to construct the Plant and prepare it for operation. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 12:37 pm by Bernie Burk
”  The Times asserted that it “considered this intolerable conduct, a grave betrayal of trust, and a breach of the basic professional standards that all lawyers are required to observe. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 3:00 am by INFORRM
  There is a huge difference between, say, rape (which is a grave offence that can result in life imprisonment) and the use of outdated and sexist language. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 12:00 pm by Ganesh Sitaraman, Ingrid Wuerth
 power designed to promote such a goal…” (quoting United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In 1972, the Court went further and found in Eisenstadt v. [read post]