Search for: "Gray v. HAS" Results 561 - 580 of 1,990
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2010, 4:05 am
Hearsay evidence may be the basis for an administrative disciplinary determinationMatter of Hughes v New York State Unified Ct. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 1:05 am by Dave
In terms of HRA 1998, which came into force in 2000 after the decision in Gray v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:24 am by Evan Brown
Worldwide Film Entertainment has sued over 700 anonymous Bittorrent users over the 2007 film The Gray Man. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 12:41 am
In a firm judgment delving unusually deep into the factual quagmire, the Court of Appeal has overturned the first instance decision in Force India Formula One Team Limited v (1) Etihad Airways, (2) Aldar Properties [2010] EWCA Civ 1051 (see here). [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
Presiding Justice Gray dissented without an opinion.The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:51 am by Dave
In Henry and Mitchell v Henry [2010] UKPC 3, the Privy Council have given further consideration to the doctrine of proprietary estoppel. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:51 am by Dave
In Henry and Mitchell v Henry [2010] UKPC 3, the Privy Council have given further consideration to the doctrine of proprietary estoppel. [read post]
21 May 2010, 9:14 am by Lawrence Solum
Here I suggest that some indication may be gleaned from the decision in UWA v Gray [2009] FCAFC 116. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 12:13 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
The federal district court, southern district of New York, has raised doubts about the facts asserted in the case of United States v. [read post]
29 May 2022, 1:02 am by Frank Cranmer
A week in which we learned the meaning of “WTF”… … err, “Wine Time Friday”, from the Sue Gray report (at p30). [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
On the other hand, it has been suggested that the decision in Callery v Gray approving a figure as a reasonable premium in road traffic cases at the time has set that figure as a base-line and has resulted in the eradication of downward pressure in the market; and that the requirement for a Rogers v Merthyr Tydfil statement does not in practice ensure that premiums are competitive".Later the Report observes: "In Callery v… [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:58 am by thejaghunter
” The shinning moment Tuesday in an otherwise gray and rainy day occurred outside the courthouse, not inside. [read post]