Search for: "HALE v. HALE"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,471
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2012, 3:47 am
From Monday 23 until Tuesday 24 July 2012 is the appeal of The Catholic Child Welfare Society & Ors v Various claimants & Ors, to be heard by L Phillips, L Hale, L Kerr, L Wilson, and L Carnwath. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 4:39 am
Lady Hale and Lord Carnwath give a short joint judgment concurring with the majority in relation to the Secretary of State’s appeal but dissenting on the cross appeal. [read post]
7 May 2007, 12:14 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) David Leroy Hale v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 8:09 am
Comment At the close of proceedings, Lady Hale reassured everyone that the justices “don’t underestimate the importance of the issues” in the instant appeals. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
On Monday 28 March, Peter Stewart v The Queen will be heard by Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
7 May 2013, 1:07 pm
On May 3, 2013, the Hawaii Supreme Court issued an opinion awarding appellate attorney's fees and costs against the City & County of Honolulu in the amount of $41,192.00 in attorney's fees and $343.00 in costs in Kaleikini v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:30 pm
Ralph Richard Banks, Standford Law, asks, Brown v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 8:47 pm
The same law firms (Irell & Manella for Fortress/VLSI, and Wilmer Hale for Intel and, in California, also for Apple) are working on the infringement cases as well as the antitrust action.Here's the complete verdict form:21-03-02 VLSI v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 6:45 am
The case involved is Wegelin v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:48 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - In the matter of American Petroleum Institute v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 12:35 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California’s order granting a preliminary injunction in East Bay Sanctuary et al. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
Lord Dyson gave the leading judgment for the five-member majority, which also comprised Lord Phillips, Lady Hale, Lord Judge and Lord Kerr. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:26 am
Lady Hale set out the terms of the reference to the court and stated in the view of the court, the principled solution to the case would be to treat the care component of DLA as an invalidity benefit for the purpose of the Council Regulation (EC) No 1408/71. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:03 am
Both of these authorities were cited with apparent approval in Baroness Hale’s leading judgment in the Supreme Court: see paragraphs 20 and 30. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 7:34 am
The reason that Parliament was wrong was set out in the case of MacDonald v Fernandez where no less a personage than Hale LJ (as she then was) held that an s21 notice was not a notice to quit and hence that the s21 regime fell outside the common law notice to quit regime. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm
Baroness Hale/Lord Walker are quite amusing about the foundational case, Gissing v Gissing [1971] AC 886 noting that “their Lordships speeches were singularly unresponsive to each other” (at [28]), but then the hard work begins. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:05 am
Law Lessons from Lee v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 4:33 am
The post Case Preview: Al-Jedda v Secretary of State for the Home Department appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 1:02 pm
By Eric Goldman Xcentric Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:48 pm
Particular highlights include: Baroness Hale of Richmond DBE QC, our keynote speaker, who has given a number of significant judgments on housing law cases in the last few years, including Austin v LB Southwark (tolerated trespass); Ali v Birmingham CC (Article 6 and homelessness); Rodriguez v Government of Gibraltar (discrimination in the allocation of housing); Meier v Secretary of State (scope of possession orders); and Pinnock v Manchester. [read post]