Search for: "HALE v. STATE"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,076
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2014, 7:31 am
(citing Hale v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 7:31 am
(citing Hale v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:59 am
The post Case Comment – Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v James [2013] UKSC 67 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 1:52 pm
Plus there are dozens of district attorneys (plus the California Attorney General) aware of the problem and with access to the sympathetic ear of state legislators.Given this fact, I decided that it's probably best to simply let this one sit. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 6:32 am
I have to say that there were some words of comfort from Lady Hale in the recent case of Dunhill v Burgin. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:42 am
In addressing the very nature of human rights law, Lord Reed called with approval upon the words of Lord Cooke in R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 2 AC 532: “The truth is, I think, that some rights are inherent and fundamental to democratic civilised society. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am
This principle was famously laid down in the case of Sidhu v British Airways (where passengers could not sue at common law for harm resulting from their plane having been high jacked following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait), and subsequently applied by senior courts around the world, including notably the United States Supreme Court in El Al Israel Airlines v Tseng (though Justice Stevens there dissented). [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:11 am
These Regulations enable civil proceedings in UK courts for breaches of the EC Regulations, and state that compensation awarded may include sums for injury to feelings. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:02 am
On Tuesday 4 March 2014 is the matter of R (George) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:05 pm
In Hall v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 3:07 pm
In Walden v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:26 pm
The morning’s proceedings begin with a return to Al-Nashiri’s alleged role in the attack on the French oil tanker the M/V Limburg in Yemen in October 2002. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:12 am
A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland), heard 22 – 23 January 2014. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:03 pm
The lead case is Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 5:49 am
But back to Durkin v DSG Retail Ltd and HFC Bank Plc. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:04 pm
Minimum wage laws are sentimental legislation with all-too-real effects [Jeffrey Dorfman] “Our Business’s Response to California $2 Minimum Wage Increase” [Coyote, with more on a union angle on minimum wage laws] Some experience from Europe [Steve Hanke, more, Cato overview of minimum wage debate] Connecticut fires state labor department employee who gamed system to get benefits for friend, then reinstates after grievance [Raising Hale] Oldie but goodie:… [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:19 am
Lady Hale expresses grave doubts about whether sending the case back to the High Court for further enquiries into the children’s states of mind would be a fruitful exercise [67]. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm
“Transaction costs, privacy, and trust: The laudable goals and ultimate failure of notice and choice to respect privacy online”, Kirsten Martin, First Monday, Next week in the courts On 22 and 23 January 2014, the Supreme Court (Lady Hale and Lords Wilson, Reed, Hughes and Hodge) will hear the case of Secretary of State for Home Department v A. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:20 am
Abbott Labs. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
On the contrary, Mr Carr QC stated that issue estoppel and abuse of process are “all about justice” and noted the courts’ attempts to restrict the scope of strict action estoppel in cases such as Arnold v National Westminster Bank plc [1991] 2 AC 93 precisely because it can lead to injustice. [read post]
