Search for: "HAMMER v. STATE" Results 561 - 580 of 781
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2019, 4:41 am by SHG
With respect to due process, “[a] non-domiciliary tortfeasor has minimum contacts with the forum State . . . if it purposefully avails itself of the privilege of conducting activities within the forum State” (LaMarca, 95 NY2d at 216 [internal quotations marks and citations omitted]),“thus invoking the benefits and protections of [the forum state’s] laws” (Hanson v Denckla, 357 US 235, 253 [1958]). [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 6:24 pm by Peter Mahler
Rosania v Gluck As far as I know, the first case to raise that lurking question post-Raharney is Rosania v Gluck, 2019 NY Slip Op 32087(U) [Sup Ct NY County July 8, 2019], decided earlier this month by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Saliann Scarpulla. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
He was just six years old when the Court decided Brown v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 5:11 pm
See also Matter of Warburg, 38 Misc.2d 997, 237 N.Y.S.2d 557; Matter of Hammer, 33 Misc.2d 67 [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:30 pm by Kent Scheidegger
"I doubt the prosecutor actually will hammer on this point. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 1:12 pm by Jeff Gamso
As of 3:58 Eastern Time, the docket doesn't reflect the freeing, though it does recount the January 5 date.John Kindley at People v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:30 pm by FDABlog HPM
  "Congress may not ... 'authorize the issuance of patents whose effects are to remove existent knowledge from the public domain, or to restrict free access to materials already available.'''  Bonito Boats, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:41 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The agency's enabling language is in Article V, Sec. 1a of the state constitution, while its statutory authority lies in Chapter 33 of the Government Code.The agency's budget for FY 2010 from the general revenue fund was was $1,001,626, cut slightly to $948,000 per year over the next biennium. [read post]