Search for: "HAWKINS v. HAWKINS"
Results 561 - 580
of 761
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2009, 8:48 pm
In today’s case (Gulamani v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:21 am
Jones had a very good draw (good for him, anyway, and bad for the Arizona Attorney General) and got three Democratic appointees: one from Carter (Betty Fletcher) and two from Clinton (Hawkins and Thomas). [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 8:35 am
Fletcher and Hawkins) finds IAC in the sentencing phase of this capital prosecution for two murders. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 1:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 8:51 am
U.S. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 4:57 am
U.S. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:21 am
Bauer, Jason Hawkins, Charles L. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 12:00 pm
The first is authored by cross-town friend and UH law prof Jim Hawkins (pictured) and is titled "Doctors as Bankers: Evidence from Fertility Markets. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:57 pm
One which I blogged about over a year ago, Hawkins v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 6:53 am
But since "CPL 470.15(2)(a) authorizes an appellate court to modify a judgment by reducing a conviction to a lesser included offense if it determines the evidence is insufficient to support a conviction for the greater offense but sufficient to establish defendant's guilt of the lesser " (People v Hawkins, 99 NY2d 592 [2003]) and the prerequisite for doing that is preservation of the issue by an appropriate motion for a trial order of dismissal why is a claim of… [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 12:58 am
The case is Ray v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 7:35 am
When motion to dismiss is not sufficiently specific there is not a preserved issue of law before the appellate court (See People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484 [2008](discussed here).One would think that fourteen years later defense attorneys would be familiar with and comply with the requirement that there be a specific motion for a trial order of dismissal. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 12:53 pm
., v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 12:53 pm
., v. [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 12:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 6:39 am
U.S. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 7:23 am
Thompson v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 5:50 am
Richter v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 9:49 am
Hawkins, 540 U. [read post]