Search for: "HEAD v. CALIFORNIA" Results 561 - 580 of 2,887
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2015, 10:35 am by Steven M. Sweat
A verdict was recently reached in Los Angeles County in the case of Cardona v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Adopting this line of reasoning threatens to turn the right of publicity on its head. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:16 pm
According to the opinion rendered by the regional appeals court, which also governs California, a man was shot in the head sitting in his car outside a pool hall. [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:36 pm
When respondent pointed the gun at Zavala, it was only inches from her head. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 9:58 am
" She eventually goes to a doctor, who says she has something like whiplash from the head pull. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:34 am
  Maurice Ruffin was a prisoner, and a guard saw a female visitor with her head in his lap in the visiting area. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:18 pm
  The back of his head was flat -- a classic symptom of neglect (i.e., you're left on your back so routinely while your parents smoke meth that your skull deforms). [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
UPONOR Minn2013http://t.co/T61hjeeHwT -> Joinder in BitTorrent copyright claim ok, TCYK, LLC v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 4:34 am by Edith Roberts
California; and a double-jeopardy case, Currier v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am by Eugene Volokh
The California Channel does not appear to have any express policy permitting unlicensed use for any purpose.] [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 5:46 am by SHG
  Will the public prefer its government to use its head or its heart? [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 3:53 pm by NARF
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2022.html Meglitsch v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 5:03 am by Justin Driver
Voters in California during the 1990s and legislators in Alabama two decades later enacted their own versions of these initiatives, as supporters of both measures hoped to spark a reassessment of Plyler v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:37 pm by INFORRM
Issue: the standard of proof in s.9 applications In Wright v Ver [2020] 1 WLR 3913, Dingemans LJ held (obiter) that the standard of proof in s.9 applications is the ‘balance of probabilities’. [read post]