Search for: "HUGHES v. HUGHES"
Results 561 - 580
of 3,074
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2007, 4:59 am
Target Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 2:09 am
There were no school rules prohibiting running in the walkway; a point noted by the trial judge His Honour Judge Iain Hughes. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
Giving the lead majority judgment Lord Hughes stated that questioning and search under compulsion undoubtedly constitutes an interference with art 8(1). [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:36 pm
This was first posted on 23 February 2010 and is the first part of a three part post in which Hugh Tomlinson QC considers the future of the law of privacy. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:17 pm
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a specialist in media and information law and an editor of Inforrm [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 5:54 am
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of the Matrix Chambers media and information practice group. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 7:13 am
If not, you may have missed the addition of UCL's annual Sir Hugh Laddie lecture. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 6:03 am
This year's lecture will be delivered by David Vaver and focus on the contribution of Sir Hugh to IP law in the UK and beyond. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 4:50 pm
Yueng v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm
Google contended that it was not, relying on the English decisions of in Metropolitan International Schools Ltd v Designtechnica Corporation [2009] EWHC 1765 and Tamiz v Google Inc [2012] EWHC 449. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 4:53 pm
Stephen Jones, and Alan's daughter, Hilary, kindly shared a short obituary with IPKat readers.Rose Hughes analysed the recent decision in Philip Morris v BAT [2023] EWHC 2616 (Pat), which dealt with the standard for invalidity due to added matter. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 8:47 am
Rose Hughes reported on the decision. [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 6:52 am
Levy, Professor Emeritus of the Department of History of the University of Oklahoma, is the recipient of the 2020 Hughes-Gossett Award for the best article published in the Journal of Supreme Court Historyfor "Twenty-One Months of Hell and the Supreme Court to the Rescue in McLaurin v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm
Franz, “Ohio v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 3:56 pm
Trevor Hughes and his crack team at the IAPP have established a space for thinking not about what’s urgeny, but about what’s important when it comes to privacy. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:10 pm
In the case of Lachaux v Independent Print ([2015] EWHC 2242 (QB)) Warby J gave judgement on preliminary issues including in relation to “serious harm” in a number of libel actions brought against three newspapers and the Huffington Post. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 2:18 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential decision in Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 4:15 am
See Quake v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
Privacy Shield to Intensify – National Law Review https://t.co/06h5Nx8Pcc 2022-03-27 Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2022-03-26 https://t.co/wZTOqzHTxt 2022-03-27 The Humanity of Copyright – Hugh Stephens Blog https://t.co/BHpwzRy8E4 2022-03-27 Contempt penalty for streaming IPTV contrary to court order, probation 2022 ONSC 1710 (CanLII) | Dish Network L.L.C… https://t.co/VHEpWNzy6U 2022-03-30 online contract terms enforced by court, Scott v. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 5:00 am
https://t.co/CD0D6WygcQ 2022-09-13 Hugh Stephens: Bill C-18 is a necessary step to redressing a market imbalance https://t.co/FuVBgRiJAv…The post Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2022-09-17 appeared first on Barry Sookman. [read post]
