Search for: "Hale v. State"
Results 561 - 580
of 973
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 12:00 am
Lady Hale at §207 and Lord Kerr at §248) they also approved his formulation. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 10:01 am
Mark Fleming of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP argued the case for Joel Judulang. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 3:46 am
See Hale v. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 5:52 am
This has been repeatedly confirmed both by local courts and the ECtHR (P v Poland [2012] ECHR 1853). [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 2:23 pm
Ct. at 1381, quoting United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 2:39 pm
DuPont v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 11:06 am
Barrett v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 1:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
22 May 2017, 1:00 am
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:35 am
The Lord Advocate states he will address alternatives. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:07 pm
On 16 February 2021 Tipples J handed down judgment in the libel and data protection case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWHC 269 (QB). [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:30 pm
On the first day after a long Thanksgiving weekend, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied, without stating any particular reasons, a petition filed by Samsung earlier this month for a further rehearing en banc in an Apple v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 5:23 am
In R (M) v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 Baroness Hale held that “care and attention” meant “looking after” someone and “looking after” meant doing something for the person being cared for which he cannot or should not be expected to do for himself.SL had attempted suicide in 2009 after he had become homeless. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
In relation to the provision of accommodation under the National Assistance Act 1948, my noble and learned friend, Baroness Hale of Richmond, then Hale LJ, said in R (Wahid) v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council [2002] EWCA Civ 287 [2003] HLR 13, para 33, "[n]eed is a relative concept, which trained and experienced social workers are much better equipped to assess than are lawyers and courts, provided that they act rationally". [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 8:50 am
In Gridiron Management Group LLC v. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
So, to hale them into court, the Art Owners must demonstrate that this case falls within one of the FSIA’s exceptions. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
