Search for: "Harris v. West*" Results 561 - 580 of 985
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am by INFORRM
Resolved cases included: Chris Magee v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 22/02/2013; Mr Nicholas Thomas v The Independent, Clause 1, 21/02/2013; Steven Wolf v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 21/02/2013; Mr Orhan Bicer v Middleton Guardian, Clause 1, 21/02/2013; Mr Darren Meldrum v The Scottish Sun, Clause 3, 21/02/2013; Mr Simon Sanderson v Daily Mail, Clauses 1, 12, 21/02/2013; Mr William McNee v Daily Record, Clauses 3, 6, 21/02/2013; Mr William McNee… [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
NGN has agreed to pay Dr Harris “substantial damages” plus legal costs, a settlement that was “tantamount to an admission of liability” of hacking at The Sun dating from his days as an MP. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the June 20 conference)   Harris v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Journalism and regulation There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but several resolved complaints including: Alexander Anderson v Press & Journal (Aberdeen), 8/02/2013; Dr Mark Bailey v Irish News, Clause 1, 07/02/2013; A man & a woman v Sunday World, Clauses 1, 3, 5, 07/02/2013; Hertfordshire Constabulary v Hertfordshire Mercury, Clause 1, 07/02/2013; A woman v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 3, 07/02/2013, A woman v The Mail on… [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 7:55 am by Eric Goldman
Losing on federal preemption after 4 years of fruitless litigation is extremely embarrassing for Kamala Harris’ office. * Campbell v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 11:24 am by Zack Bluestone
” During the hearing, Admiral Harry Harris testified that “China is clearly militarizing the South China Sea, and you’d have to believe in flat earth to think otherwise. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 3:40 pm by Cody M. Poplin
If attributed to hackers, Harris writes that the hack would be “the first documented case of a cyber attack on an electrical power facility that led to a loss of electricity. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:30 am by INFORRM
Writing on “Lib Dem Voice”, Dr Evan Harris was more cautious describing the bill as “A good start, but much still to play for. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 11:04 am by Andrew Hamm
” Briefly: At NYU Law Review Online, Matthew Christiansen previews next week’s oral argument in Hughes v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 6:03 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
In 2006, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled for Anna Nicole (the case was Marshall v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 9:23 pm by Goldstein & Stamm, P.A.
For example, the Supreme Court of Arizona said last April in the case of State ex rel Montgomery v. [read post]