Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 561 - 580
of 82,095
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2014, 5:00 pm
In Guilmette v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:21 am
For judgment, please download: [2014] UKSC 38 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press SummaryFor a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 39 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 4:51 am
App. 4th 489 (2011), which held that AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
In a near-unanimous decision yesterday in Virginia v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
United States and McDonnell v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 11:52 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decided the case of State of Texas v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 11:50 am
Washburn student intern Stacey Schlimmer and I won in State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 2:03 pm
June 18, 2021) The post State Government’s Alleged Copyright Infringement Wasn’t a “Taking”–Jim Olive v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:13 am
In two major decisions today that will interest the readers of this site, the Supreme Court held that the class alleging gender discrimination against Wal-Mart was improperly certified in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 7:43 pm
The trial in Capitol Records v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 9:48 am
Next week, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 3:04 am
" The Ninth Circuit held that "the maximum term of imprisonment . . . prescribed by law" must be determined without taking recidivist enhancements into account. [read post]
7 May 2019, 6:30 am
Michael Wade Nance v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court held in Montgomery v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 9:12 am
Today the Supreme Court held, 8-1, in Lopez v. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 5:04 am
United States, 593 U.S. 420 (2021). [read post]
2 May 2022, 5:16 pm
Cindy V. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 4:00 pm
Initially, in State v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:16 pm
Here is the abstract: In 1874, the Supreme Court held in Murdock v City of Memphis that it lacked “jurisdiction” to review a state supreme court’s interpretation of state law, even in cases that present federal-law claims. [read post]
