Search for: "Howard v. State of California"
Results 561 - 580
of 581
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:00 am
Supreme Court, in Kelo v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 2:40 pm
Kevin Rudd has sided with the media in its tussle with the Howard Government on press freedom. [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:10 am
The claim in Watson v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
Standard Oil of California, 332 U.S. 301, 314 (1947). [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 9:06 pm
The following argument preview was written by Howard Jacobson, a partner in Akin Gump's DC office. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 4:22 am
While he had been a strong supporter of federalism in US v Lopez and US v Morrison, Scalia held back in Gonzales v Raich, the California medical marijuana case (I'll be discussing that case further in the post). [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:00 am
End Notes: [1] Howard E. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 2:11 pm
The specific state statute, not dissimilar from many States' grandparent visitation laws after the US Supreme Court ruling in Troxel v Granville, states as follows: Cal. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 5:29 am
The court and government erred in giving aggravated felony adjustments for state (California) prior convictions that could, under the categorical appraoch, be for possession of drugs and not selling.US v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 9:47 pm
" State v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 3:25 pm
The Circuit Court, quite unexpectedly, asked the constitutional question on May 4, 2005, in an otherwise fairly routine case about California parole procedures -- the case of Irons v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 12:04 am
The ruling in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 10:45 pm
In Hyde v. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:06 pm
., Amber Taylor responds to her heckler by explaining how he also could get into Harvard.David Lat at Above the Law reports on the case of Steinbuch v. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 8:52 am
Whether it was because the federal law in this area is simply not clearly established at all, or because there are clearly established principles but reasonable people could disagree with how they play out on these facts, there was no basis under the habeas statute for upsetting the state court results.A hat tip to Howard Bashman at How Appealing. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 8:14 am
United States [Volokh Conspiracy] Carrington v. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 10:18 am
Next month, "regulatory takings" proposals will be on the ballot in six western states: Arizona, California, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, and Washington. [read post]
In California, Paternity Dispute Over Who Is The Father Of Anna Nicole Smith's Child May Go To Court
18 Oct 2006, 7:25 pm
Smith claims that her attorney Howard K. [read post]
