Search for: "Human v. State" Results 561 - 580 of 19,174
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2011, 11:02 am by Robert Tanha
Each week, Wise Law Blog reviews important decisions from the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal.SUBSTANTIVE RULINGSBianca v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 12:10 pm
Discrimination complaint dismissed because law did not require an accommodation at the time the request for an accommodation was made Matter of Rappo v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2008 NY Slip Op 09447, decided on December 2, 2008, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe New York State Division of Human Rights dismissed Frances V. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 10:54 am by Cindy Cohn and Cindy Cohn
Files: cisco_amicus_brief.pdfRelated Issues: Export ControlsState Surveillance & Human RightsRelated Cases: Kidane v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 5:00 am by INFORRM
A few months after the now infamous judgment of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in Delfi v Estonia  (for background, see my earlier post here), the Fourth Section of the Court issued on 2 February 2016 a judgment (MTE v Hungary) dealing with similar issues. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 2:53 am
Do laws that constrain state agents on state territory also apply abroad? [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Some would argue that it is an imposition on human freedom. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:19 am by Graeme Hall
FA (Iraq) (FC) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant): Supreme Court refers humanitarian protection appeal rights question to Court of Justice of European Union. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:25 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
” “The Alberta Human Rights Tribunal had little difficulty finding that the employer had terminated the employee based on a disability, contrary to the Alberta Human Rights Act and had little excuse. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 1:00 am by sally
” Full story The Guardian, 1st February 2011 Source: www.guardian.co.uk Related link: Full judgment: ZH (Tanzania) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:25 pm by John W. Arden
Department of Agriculture, and the difference between the treatment of "Harvestland" chickens and those of competitors stated claims for violation of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, fraud in the inducement, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of express warranty, according to the federal district court in Newark (Hemy v. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 3:35 pm by SJM
Thirdly, it followed that the State had failed to protect B’s physical and psychological integrity and that there had been a violation of the positive duty under Article 8 (applying X & Y v Netherlands). [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:01 am by Holger Hembach
In Robathin v Austria, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) scrutinized a search and seizure in a law office in light of article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]