Search for: "Hunter v. Hunter" Results 561 - 580 of 1,605
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2019, 4:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The doctrine of res judicata precludes the plaintiff from litigating the claims set forth in his complaint, as a judgment on the merits exists in the prior action between the same parties involving the same subject matter (see Matter of Josey v Goord, 9 NY3d 386, 389; Matter of Hunter, 4 NY3d 260, 269). [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 4:16 am
The controlling statute of limitations for filing an Article 78 petition challenging an administrative decision may be set out in another lawHayes v City of NY Dept. of Citywide Admin. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 9:18 pm by Walter Olson
Minneapolis police arrest author-blogger-gun rights activist Joel Rosenberg [Popehat, Mark Bennett, Scott Greenfield] In Wal-Mart v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:58 am
” Now, anyone who knows anything about patent judges will know that they love experts who give their evidence in a moderate and balanced fashion and are willing to concede points where it is reasonable to do so – see for example Mr Justice Arnold’s comments about Professor Hunter in GUK v Yeda. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 1:17 pm
Members of the group have discussed their skills as hunters and claim they will use these skills to protect Dan Dow, and ‘protect our own. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by Frank Cranmer
The authors also pointed out that, at the time of writing, R v Hunter, MacKinder and Atkinson [1974] 1 QB 95, [1973] 3 All ER 286 CA appeared to be the first example since the late nineteenth century of a prosecution for the offence. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 5:42 pm
    Well, today the Supremes moved in the opposite direction, holding in Arias v. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 7:43 am
Hunter, No. 96-4259, 1998 WL 887289, at *3 (4th Cir. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:42 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal’s guidance given in JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 42 in respect of anonymity orders was held to apply equally to orders applied for under section 39. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 8:13 am by Howard Friedman
 The court dismissed plaintiff's RUIPA challenge because he failed to provide evidence that the jail received federal funds.In Hunter v. [read post]