Search for: "IN RE HOFFMAN"
Results 561 - 580
of 953
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2011, 3:31 am
You're a lawprof. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 10:41 am
" Complain that "kids these days" don't know a thing; they're "zero marginal product" workers; they don't deserve to be paid till they're truly experienced. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 10:40 am
” Complain that “kids these days” don’t know a thing; they’re “zero marginal product” workers; they don’t deserve to be paid till they’re truly experienced. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 1:35 pm
The case is In re Durham. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:34 pm
The character-actor duel of Seymour Hoffman and Paul Giamatti is worth the ticket price alone. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 11:05 pm
If you want to finish an article this November, you’re in. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 9:50 pm
Dustin Hoffman 11. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Res. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm
The Trial In what I still think was a practical joke, Judge Everingham gave the parties 15 hours a side to put on their evidence (candidly, we're used to less than that), and at trial the plaintiff took 14:34, and the defendant used 8:37. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:31 pm
Hoffman, 149 N.J. 564, 584 (1997). [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Res. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:06 am
I think the choice of Dustin Hoffman and Meryl Streep was exactly the right choice. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm
I’m on a family trip today and tomorrow, but if you’re interested in the subject, check out this set of posts, and especially this one, which I reproduce below:When are knowingly false statements of fact constitutionally unprotected? [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 8:17 am
Instead, you're acting like a right winger. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 12:43 pm
Named plaintiffs include Davis, Thompson, Graham, Singley, Howard, Seamon, Beatty, Parrish, Rutledge, Brkic and Hoffman [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 2:59 am
You must develop a question or educated guess of how something works in order to test whether you're correct. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 4:03 am
Source: azfamily.com, "Doctor who oversees Child Fatality Review Board Speaks Out", by Sybil Hoffman, Sept. 29, 2011. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 2:37 pm
Once you're following the conversation, the question in Greene v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 3:02 am
It's that they're too difficult to understand. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:56 pm
I haven’t done the kind of empirical research that Dave Hoffman or Dan Kahan have on cultural cognition, but I still wanted to advance a pair of non-quantitative (but still empirical) reasons in praise of the cool style. [read post]
