Search for: "Idaho Supreme Court" Results 561 - 580 of 1,995
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2018, 8:41 am by Evan Lee
” It is not clear whether the Supreme Court will adopt some kind of presumption of deficient performance in situations like Garza’s. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 10:19 am
I see that she was Miss Idaho in 2004, she's fluent in Russian, and she has sons who are named Blaise and Beckett (which I'm just guessing is a tribute to Blaise Pascal and Samuel Beckett). [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:00 am by Julie I. Fershtman
The Idaho Supreme Court upheld dismissal of the case and found that the “the ‘fence out’ rule prevails in Idaho, and that where a herd district has not been established, cattle are customarily permitted to roam. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 10:10 am by Bill Raftery
Focus Trend: Stripping Rule Making Power of Supreme Courts Iowa moves to strip its supreme court of jurisdiction over same-sex marriage cases A Missouri bill would prohibit its courts from using “non-originalist” or “living, breathing document” interpretations of laws and constitutions Arizona and New Mexico’s Houses move to increase the requirements for magistrates and judges Illinois House members are asking the… [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 6:46 am by Kevin H. Gilmore
The Supreme Court of Idaho recently issued a reminder to parties that discovery requests must be narrowly tailored in proportion to the needs of the litigation and that serving overly broad discovery requests is not a court-approved negotiation tactic. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 6:46 am by Kevin H. Gilmore
The Supreme Court of Idaho recently issued a reminder to parties that discovery requests must be narrowly tailored in proportion to the needs of the litigation and that serving overly broad discovery requests is not a court-approved negotiation tactic. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 6:46 am by Kevin H. Gilmore
The Supreme Court of Idaho recently issued a reminder to parties that discovery requests must be narrowly tailored in proportion to the needs of the litigation and that serving overly broad discovery requests is not a court-approved negotiation tactic. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 10:25 am by Kurt Holzer
   The Idaho Supreme Court offers  a variety of information online so people can understand and help themselves when dealing with legal issues. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 8:01 pm by John Fossum
The Minnesota Supreme Court today issued a decision creating an odd new hole in the right to remain silent. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 7:28 am by Chuck Peterson
In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that defense lawyers must inform their clients of any plea offers and give competent advice about whether to accept them. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:00 pm
The Sacketts bought an undeveloped 2/3s acre lot near Priest Lake, Idaho. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 5:33 am by Nicholas J. Wagoner
After identifying the three paths taken by the courts mentioned above, the Idaho district court reached the following conclusion, This analysis shows that courts have at least three different approaches to the issue, and the parties have not cited any binding precedent from the Ninth Circuit or the Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:18 am by James J. Scherer
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the EPA, and on appeal to the Supreme Court, the case was remanded back to the District Court of Idaho. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 12:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit striking down such bans in Idaho and Nevada. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 2:22 pm by Chuck Peterson
This summer the Idaho Supreme Court considered the circumstances in which a law enforcement officer may make an arrest for a misdemeanor not committed in his or her presence. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 2:22 pm by Chuck Peterson
This summer the Idaho Supreme Court considered the circumstances in which a law enforcement officer may make an arrest for a misdemeanor not committed in his or her presence. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 2:22 pm by Chuck Peterson
This summer the Idaho Supreme Court considered the circumstances in which a law enforcement officer may make an arrest for a misdemeanor not committed in his or her presence. [read post]