Search for: "In Re: Bader v."
Results 561 - 580
of 586
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2009, 11:30 am
On Monday of this week, the Justices granted review of Salazar (Interior Secretary) v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 12:10 am
"We're actively looking for lawyers in that area. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 7:32 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote for the Court in Arizona v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 5:31 pm
To that, Justice Scalia retorted: “Bawdy jokes are OK, if they’re really good! [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:01 pm
The Court spent an hour Tuesday talking about different approaches, in Bartlett v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:26 am
This is from Peter V. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 11:06 pm
You're still reading? [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 4:59 pm
Ruth Bader Ginsburg Supreme Court of the United States One First Street, NE Washington, D.C. 20543 Re: Judicial (In)competency Dear Justice Ginsburg: I last wrote to you on September 26, 2006 regarding the Lewis F. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:42 pm
Barack Obama (D-Ill.) criticized [Kennedy v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 3:36 pm
That is an adage, the Court said then in Reynolds v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 1:14 pm
The reason for the pervasive skepticism during the hour-long argument in Davis v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 12:59 pm
Kennedy and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm
I. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 12:36 pm
But note, both Roberts and Alito voted against the employer in the recent case of Federal Express v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:10 am
But not Ruth Bader. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 6:27 am
But I think it's a safe bet that by listening to candidates' words and reflecting on their actions and their lives, we can get a good sense of whether they're more likely to appoint someone like the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist or Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.I like my constitutional rights the way they are right now -- or more accurately, the way they were a few years ago -- and I'd like to keep them for PunditGirl, as well. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:29 pm
Experts on voting rights see the legal battle over Indiana's toughest-in-the-nation voter identification law as the most starkly partisan case to reach the court since Bush v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 10:08 pm
There's only 1 mention, at p. 66, of Johnson v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
A 1986 case, Batson v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 12:44 pm
Very cool stuff.Speaking of Justice Ginsburg and dissenting opinions, we're relying on one right now: McMillian v. [read post]
