Search for: "In Re Adoption of Steven S." Results 561 - 580 of 763
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2010, 7:43 am
"Since we're going to see a lot more laws challenged in courts across the country, I think communities are going to be more hesitant for some time to be willing to adopt smart restrictions on guns. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:08 pm by dsd2
[Note that appendices are issued by date so there may be several volumes of appendices to check] • There are also series of drafts leading up to a Restatement’s adoption (e.g., preliminary, tentative). [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 10:01 am by Nathan
  Today’s Skilling decision is a major adoption of that rule. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 5:23 pm
  The First, Second, Fourth, and Tenth Circuits adopted positions similar to the Seventh Circuit's. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 12:59 am by PJ Blount
The Re-Launch of Australia’s Space Policy and Some Possible Legal Implications. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 5:44 am by Russ Bensing
  Those results weren’t surprising; only Stevens dissented in Powell, and Shatzer was unanimous. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
The inability of the Jones Act seaman's survivors to recover loss of society damages in the negligence action does not result from the language of the Jones Act or the FELA. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:03 am by Erin Miller
   Justice Kennedy’s opinion for the Court in Lawrence explicitly adopted Justice Stevens’ dissent as the basis for overruling Bowers: “Justice Stevens’ analysis  . . . [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:04 am by Theo Francis
Cablevision aside, these tend to be dull affairs: Uncontested incumbents are re-elected, vague executive incentive plans are adopted, auditors are rehired, and shareholder proposals are shot down — from greenhouse gas emissions at coal company Massey Energy (MEE) to bird welfare at BJ’s Wholesale Club (BJ). [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:11 am by Marvin Ammori
I think her scholarship (albeit from last decade) raises interesting questions about her support for some of the positions held by Justice Stevens and President Obama.This post is not about any particular decision but about a group of "rationales" often advanced by government to defend the constitutionality of adopted laws. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:42 am by Lyle Denniston
Although major league baseball has been exempt from the antitrust laws since 1922, under a Supreme Court decision that year, the other pro leagues have not shared that immunity, and Monday’s ruling in the NFL case re-opened them to court challenge on at least some of their collective commercial efforts. [read post]
20 May 2010, 10:30 am by Lisa McElroy
  Monday was just such a day – we’re about six weeks from the Court’s traditional summer recess – so there’s tons to talk about this week in Plain English. [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:09 am by Steve Hall
A state judge said Wednesday he would soon decide whether three death row inmates have properly challenged the way the state's new lethal injection protocol was adopted and possibly on the merits of whether the method itself needs to be re-examined. [read post]
19 May 2010, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
  In this case, we’re dealing with “a particular type of sentence as it applies to an entire class of offenders. [read post]